More than 70 organizations, including the ACLU, EPIC, and Fight for the Future, say the AI smart glasses feature would endanger abuse victims, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ people.
  • etherphon@piefed.worldEnglish
    2·
    7 days ago

    I have to buy new glasses because I get a lot of looks in my black rimmed glasses even though the frames are too thin, I doubt people are paying attention. I have some new glasses on order just for peace of mind, fuck you Meta.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.caEnglish
    21·
    7 days ago

    If it makes money then nothing else counts. Go american capitalism! /s

  • bpinyon@lemmy.zipEnglish
    1·
    7 days ago

    What? They didn’t learn this the first time? Yes the glasses are a cool idea but we need to be more responsible.

    • Soapbox@lemmy.zipEnglish
      1·
      7 days ago

      I don’t even get why anyone thinks they are cool. They don’t even have displays in them. I would understand for smart glasses with no cameras, but the ability to display a HUD with navigation, music info, text messages, etc.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    40·
    8 days ago

    Name Tag, as revealed in February by The New York Times, would work through the artificial intelligence assistant built into Meta’s smart glasses, allowing wearers to pull up information about people in their field of view. Engineers have reportedly been weighing two versions of the feature: one that would only identify people the wearer is already connected to on a Meta platform, and a broader version that could recognize anyone with a public account on a Meta service such as Instagram.

    Creeps will instantly use it to go to where women are and find their accounts.

    Not to mention any woman that has to work a customer facing job.

    This would suck for men too tho, it would suck for everyone.

    But it might be what it finally takes to get the dumb masses off Meta platforms. There’s so many other reasons anyways, but idiots just can’t delete their Instas

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      111·
      7 days ago

      I saw some fucking idiot with these on at a show a few months ago and I had to exert a lot of control not to yank them off her face and stomp on them.

      Nobody wants to be recorded secretly. Especially not at a show. That’s a gross invasion of privacy - and, in fact, illegal in some jurisdictions (two-party consent laws for recordings).

      • moonshadow@slrpnk.netEnglish
        51·
        7 days ago

        Less control next time please, dunno how old you are but that’s exactly the human immune response that rid us of Google Glass. Early beta testers consistently got rocked whenever they wore them outside and the project went nowhere. I’m too old now and don’t get out enough but pray the kids are up to rejecting round 2

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        1·
        6 days ago

        I’m already that dick who calls everyone out if they’re recording or taking pictures on their phone during the show, so I am definitely comfortable calling out these jerks.

  • DarthPub@retrofed.comEnglish
    14·
    8 days ago

    I assume Zuck is putting his fingers in his ears and mechanically screeching loudly to drown out such warnings

    • pivot_root@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      7 days ago

      Pre-order now and get one free year of Flock Together—the only personal security service that combines cutting-edge facial recognition technology with Persona integration to provide real-time risk assessments of your fellow countrymen based on their social credit score, public records, and data broker profile.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    13·
    7 days ago

    More than 70 civil liberties, domestic violence, reproductive rights, LGBTQ+, labor, and immigrant advocacy organizations are demanding that Meta abandon plans to deploy face recognition on its Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses, warning that the feature—reportedly known inside the company as “Name Tag”—would hand stalkers, abusers, and federal agents the ability to silently identify strangers in public… In the May 2025 memo from Meta’s Reality Labs that the Times obtained, Meta reportedly wrote that it would launch “during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”