Take my money!

  • eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 days ago

    Looks fake. Surprised that tomshardware wrote an article when all we have is a few seconds of marketing video.

    Wait until these are in the hands of actual users.

    • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      The video I saw had a disclaimer at the end saying that no device has been built yet.

      Reminds me of this one, that made rounds some years ago and turned out to be fake as well.

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    the Photon Matrix has passed stringent certifications to ensure that it will not harm people, pets, and even birds that happen to fly across the device’s target range.

    Who’s certifying it?

  • OryxAndCake@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    So you just pray there are no mosquitos at eye level, or does everybody in the vicinity of this machine have to wear ‘anti laser glasses’?

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems insanely overengineered and potentially dangerous but cool I guess.

    We’ve had regular mosquito zappers for decades now. Is this better somehow?

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    We’re in the midst of a mass exstinction that’s crippling insect populations which are a vital part of the foodchain.

    Anything that reduces the biomass of insects is probably a bad idea. A $1000 party toy that also reduces the biomass of insects is definitely a bad idea.

    • avg@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I was just reading to see how it’s able to only target mosquitoes 😞. I’ll pay the 1k if it could guarantee that, but just bug genocide is not ok with me.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        While it uses a laser beam to strike down mosquitoes, it uses LiDAR, mmWave radar, and an AI vision module to detect targets between 2mm and 20 mm in size moving at or below 3.3 feet per second (1 meter per second).

        I remember reading about research on this topic, the noise mosquitoes make is very distinctive, and systems for targeting them exclusively can work by identifying it and triangulating its origin, but it sounds like this product does not work that way. Not sure whether the lidar/AI vision method is able to discriminate as well.

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        These evil propane systems also attract many bugs from a wiiiide area, whereas the laser thing only kills bugs that happen to come by.

        I still feel… very mixed about this thing. I’m not necessarily defending it, but if it actually works then it would be harm reduction.

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Does it distinguish mosquitos from other insects would be my second question. First one is safety, of course. I mean I’d be willing to walk in polarized glasses at home if necessary if this thing works.

    • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are already a bunch of scaled up ones that are designed to target military drones. Targeting humans with them is technically a war crime (well blinding people with lasers is a war crime, you are probably aloud to kill people with them because that doesn’t create handicap people that burden the state, war crimes are defined by the billionaire class) so expect that to be widely done too.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Idk, the mosquitoes at my place this year are so plentiful and small (hard to hit) that multiple people have asked me where the fuck those are coming from.

      If you live in the suburbs of a big city you don’t know what mosquitoes are. I live next to the forest and this summer the forest is nearly impassable on foot or bicycle apparently. Which kinda sucks because I wanted to go foraging for mushrooms soon.

      • Lowleekun [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well i understand that they feel like pests but I don’t think we got to life in nature and control how nature behaves. Or in other words, if people are fortunate enough to enjoy the wilderness they have to put up with some of the discomfort that comes along.

    • Hedgehog@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Check out the comments on the video if you want more context, a primary researcher the video references shows up to talk technical/regulatory limitations from when he worked in similar areas and the company behind the project jumps in too.

      Also skeptical, this would be cool to have but I don’t get how they could actually provide the performance they claim for the cost they charge.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Was a thing back in 2007,research paid for by Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, then patent was shelved. I thought it would be an indefinitely shelving, but maybe they think they can make more money from it now? Back then it was conceived for aid in poor countries. Maybe climate change has made other countries hot enough for mosquitoes to be a problem in countries with money.