wonderingwanderer

Not really.

If you have the agent installed, it’s like having your gun assembled.

If you have your agent enabled, it’s like having your gun loaded.

If you give your agent permissions, it’s like taking your gun off safety.

If you don’t have your agent properly sandboxed, it’s like having bad muzzle control.

And if your agent is actively running, it’s like having your finger on the trigger.

This breaks every weapon safety rule. That’s how you get a negligent discharge.

Hence, it’s like scratching your back with a loaded weapon.

Unless you’re managing app permissions on android 🙄

Is that how they bred orange chickens?

Anduril is a huge donor/sponsor of Nix Foundation and NixCon

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixcon-na-2024-is-getting-sponsored-by-anduril-what-to-do-about-it/41258/1

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/andurils-threat-is-existential/70811?page=6

https://old.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/1cfbz26/should_nisos_have_accepted_the_anduril_sponsorship/

Although it seems to be a matter of debate within the Nix community as to the nature and scope of open-source software and what limitations, if any, can (or should) be imposed…

Just learn how to harvest the next generation of chips out of their subscription-based devices that don’t have any onboard RAM or GPU, and then integrate it into your existing system.

You might have to write your own firmware and triple-check for any backdoors that might send your data back to the mothership, but it’s not like you have to cut yourself off entirely as long as you maintain your own self-sufficient system.

It is a slippery slope, we just happen to have already slid down it most of the way and are imminently about to be falling off that cliff at the end of it…

You might want to look into who’s funding NixOS…

But they added an interesting blurb in the edit, so it wasn’t for naught.

Also, OOP phrased it as unheard of syrup density, which it isn’t because of the interstitial space…

The part about predicting protein folding makes sense, but this post was about waffles…

You could ask Gemini to write it for you, but be careful it doesn’t start blending fact and fiction

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

It’s a method of fine-tuning and aligning LLMs which requires active human input

That’s fucking crazy. Did he ask it to be GM in a roleplaying choose-your-own-adventure game that got out of hand, and while they both gradually forgot that it was a game the lines between fantasy and reality became blurred by the day? Or did it just come up with this stuff out of nowhere?

Some autistics thrive on chaos, some thrive on order. I’m not the “pack a prime number into a square” kind of autistic, I’m the “why would you want to do that” kind

But it’s especially primes, cause they can’t even fit in a rectangle unless it’s 1×

Okay, but none of that applies to waffles. They said they wanted more squares for syrup, but they actually got more unused space on the waffle surface.

I guess I’m not the “figure out how to fit a prime number into a square” kind of autistic, I’m the “why would you want to do that” kind of autistic.

To me, square numbers are beautiful because of how harmoniously they can be arranged, and prime numbers are beautiful because of how unique and impossible to neatly arrange they are. Trying to treat one like the other feels like an itch that can’t be scratched…

Do I need to tap the sign?

You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don’t argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.

Literally already addressed that, but go off

You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don’t argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.

Dumbasses.

My autistic ass can’t comprehend why anyone would want to arrange a prime number in a square pattern…

But you can fit 25 squares into the same space. This isn’t efficiency, it’s just wasted space and bad planning.

You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don’t argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.