Because she didn’t win. Had she, we wouldn’t be reading headlines about your dumb fuck president trying to rename the Pacific, rolling back EPA pollution limits, paying Russia to invade the Ukraine through petrochemical purchases, chucking tantrums about not getting a Nobel Peace Prize, and every other stupid thing, every fucking day. Lots of people protested against Democrats and didn’t vote for them, which would have been fine except the US has bugger-all preferential voting, so it put Republicans in power. It’s not complicated.
It’s laughable that you think that’s a rational response, implying the Democrats were just as likely to rack up as many transgressions.
I can’t prove that my drinking glasses won’t break spontaneously by leaving them on the kitchen bench, but that’s no reason to throw them on the floor to ensure that they do.
Well done on the downvote, and a very mature response. You think you’ve got a revolution organised before the next elections, do you?
What a whiny baby
Removed by mod
voting for Kamala didn’t reduce any harm
Because she didn’t win. Had she, we wouldn’t be reading headlines about your dumb fuck president trying to rename the Pacific, rolling back EPA pollution limits, paying Russia to invade the Ukraine through petrochemical purchases, chucking tantrums about not getting a Nobel Peace Prize, and every other stupid thing, every fucking day. Lots of people protested against Democrats and didn’t vote for them, which would have been fine except the US has bugger-all preferential voting, so it put Republicans in power. It’s not complicated.
counterfactuals can’t be proven.
It’s laughable that you think that’s a rational response, implying the Democrats were just as likely to rack up as many transgressions.
I can’t prove that my drinking glasses won’t break spontaneously by leaving them on the kitchen bench, but that’s no reason to throw them on the floor to ensure that they do.
it’s laughable that you can’t build a case on facts and need to reach for fictional worlds
> Provides a factual response.
‘You’re not using facts!’
> Add an analogy to help you understand it.
Fail to understand it.
Have a nice life, mate. It’s clearly not going to be an easy one for you, having to muddle through with such poor comprehension skills.
Waaaah, waaaah