It’s laughable that you think that’s a rational response, implying the Democrats were just as likely to rack up as many transgressions.
I can’t prove that my drinking glasses won’t break spontaneously by leaving them on the kitchen bench, but that’s no reason to throw them on the floor to ensure that they do.
counterfactuals can’t be proven.
It’s laughable that you think that’s a rational response, implying the Democrats were just as likely to rack up as many transgressions.
I can’t prove that my drinking glasses won’t break spontaneously by leaving them on the kitchen bench, but that’s no reason to throw them on the floor to ensure that they do.
it’s laughable that you can’t build a case on facts and need to reach for fictional worlds
> Provides a factual response.
‘You’re not using facts!’
> Add an analogy to help you understand it.
Fail to understand it.
Have a nice life, mate. It’s clearly not going to be an easy one for you, having to muddle through with such poor comprehension skills.
there is no world in which Kamala won. that’s the fantasy.