That BlueMaga is once again pulling out the same McCarthyism that has failed them for the past decade is also not surprising. Screeching that everyone who disagrees with you is a subhuman foreigner isn’t exactly winning elections for you.
Those are the same thing dipshit, just because you call one by a dysphemism doesn’t change the underlying fact that I’m expressing my beliefs and your only response is to call me a subhuman foreigner for it.
“Everyone who disagrees with me is either a foreigner or an unthinking machine” And Other Insane Conspiracies For The Right Wing Mind.
Anyway, why do I never see you accuse people agreeing with you of being bots? The US also has massive bot farms, as does the individual parties. The most active city on Reddit was an air force base, yet I dont see you be cautious about people reinforcing your narrative? Why?
Funny to talk of semantics when you’re the one engaging in it. Do you not know how communication works? I am using you as a jumping off point for a generalisation.
So how would I point to a place where youre agreeing with someone you think is a bot, when I point out people like you don’t accuse those who agree with you of being bots?
you’re so set on using me as a jumpoff point, then, or cut the shit.
Oh wow, what a tough guy. What are you gonna do, post something really mean?
It really seems like you don’t understand what the plural you is. It seems like you think I know you. I don’t, and I am very happy with that. You seem to suck.
Anyway, the mentality you have is laughable. You expect me to go through your comment history looking for a comment where I could reasonably argue you’re agreeing with a bot, in order to substantiate my statement that I don’t ever see you types accusing those you agree with of being bots?
First of all, what kind of weirdo goes through peoples comment history in general?
Secondly, the task doesn’t even make sense. I don’t ever see you accusing anyone you agree with of being bots, that wouldn’t change even if you had done so.
Thirdly, I did just use you as a jumping off point, entirely reasonably too. You made a deranged accusation that someone was a bot because they disagreed with you. So there we go.
edit: Alright I just went through your comment history and didn’t find an instance of you accusing someone you agreed with of being a bot. Guess you’re gonna have to prove me wrong by citing a comment where you do exactly that.
edit edit: holy shit I just saw you talk to another user like you knew them personally. Talking about them having a bad reputation “around here” LMAO. You think this is some sort of personal interaction?
Removed by mod
That BlueMaga is once again pulling out the same McCarthyism that has failed them for the past decade is also not surprising. Screeching that everyone who disagrees with you is a subhuman foreigner isn’t exactly winning elections for you.
Removed by mod
“Your comment history shows that in the past you held the same beliefs you espouse now, thus proving you’re a subhuman foreigner!”
Removed by mod
Those are the same thing dipshit, just because you call one by a dysphemism doesn’t change the underlying fact that I’m expressing my beliefs and your only response is to call me a subhuman foreigner for it.
Good, I’m glad you fascist fuckers don’t like me
This line is so funny to me. Imagine writing that unironically. Do they think this is a neighborhood?
Removed by mod
“Everyone who disagrees with me is either a foreigner or an unthinking machine” And Other Insane Conspiracies For The Right Wing Mind.
Anyway, why do I never see you accuse people agreeing with you of being bots? The US also has massive bot farms, as does the individual parties. The most active city on Reddit was an air force base, yet I dont see you be cautious about people reinforcing your narrative? Why?
Removed by mod
Plural you, dumbass. As in “you types”.
You want me to cite a comment where you aren’t doing something?
Removed by mod
Funny to talk of semantics when you’re the one engaging in it. Do you not know how communication works? I am using you as a jumping off point for a generalisation.
So how would I point to a place where youre agreeing with someone you think is a bot, when I point out people like you don’t accuse those who agree with you of being bots?
Removed by mod
Oh wow, what a tough guy. What are you gonna do, post something really mean?
It really seems like you don’t understand what the plural you is. It seems like you think I know you. I don’t, and I am very happy with that. You seem to suck.
Anyway, the mentality you have is laughable. You expect me to go through your comment history looking for a comment where I could reasonably argue you’re agreeing with a bot, in order to substantiate my statement that I don’t ever see you types accusing those you agree with of being bots?
First of all, what kind of weirdo goes through peoples comment history in general?
Secondly, the task doesn’t even make sense. I don’t ever see you accusing anyone you agree with of being bots, that wouldn’t change even if you had done so.
Thirdly, I did just use you as a jumping off point, entirely reasonably too. You made a deranged accusation that someone was a bot because they disagreed with you. So there we go.
edit: Alright I just went through your comment history and didn’t find an instance of you accusing someone you agreed with of being a bot. Guess you’re gonna have to prove me wrong by citing a comment where you do exactly that.
edit edit: holy shit I just saw you talk to another user like you knew them personally. Talking about them having a bad reputation “around here” LMAO. You think this is some sort of personal interaction?
Removed by mod