Funny to talk of semantics when you’re the one engaging in it. Do you not know how communication works? I am using you as a jumping off point for a generalisation.
So how would I point to a place where youre agreeing with someone you think is a bot, when I point out people like you don’t accuse those who agree with you of being bots?
you’re so set on using me as a jumpoff point, then, or cut the shit.
Oh wow, what a tough guy. What are you gonna do, post something really mean?
It really seems like you don’t understand what the plural you is. It seems like you think I know you. I don’t, and I am very happy with that. You seem to suck.
Anyway, the mentality you have is laughable. You expect me to go through your comment history looking for a comment where I could reasonably argue you’re agreeing with a bot, in order to substantiate my statement that I don’t ever see you types accusing those you agree with of being bots?
First of all, what kind of weirdo goes through peoples comment history in general?
Secondly, the task doesn’t even make sense. I don’t ever see you accusing anyone you agree with of being bots, that wouldn’t change even if you had done so.
Thirdly, I did just use you as a jumping off point, entirely reasonably too. You made a deranged accusation that someone was a bot because they disagreed with you. So there we go.
edit: Alright I just went through your comment history and didn’t find an instance of you accusing someone you agreed with of being a bot. Guess you’re gonna have to prove me wrong by citing a comment where you do exactly that.
edit edit: holy shit I just saw you talk to another user like you knew them personally. Talking about them having a bad reputation “around here” LMAO. You think this is some sort of personal interaction?
Plural you, dumbass. As in “you types”.
You want me to cite a comment where you aren’t doing something?
Removed by mod
Funny to talk of semantics when you’re the one engaging in it. Do you not know how communication works? I am using you as a jumping off point for a generalisation.
So how would I point to a place where youre agreeing with someone you think is a bot, when I point out people like you don’t accuse those who agree with you of being bots?
Removed by mod
Oh wow, what a tough guy. What are you gonna do, post something really mean?
It really seems like you don’t understand what the plural you is. It seems like you think I know you. I don’t, and I am very happy with that. You seem to suck.
Anyway, the mentality you have is laughable. You expect me to go through your comment history looking for a comment where I could reasonably argue you’re agreeing with a bot, in order to substantiate my statement that I don’t ever see you types accusing those you agree with of being bots?
First of all, what kind of weirdo goes through peoples comment history in general?
Secondly, the task doesn’t even make sense. I don’t ever see you accusing anyone you agree with of being bots, that wouldn’t change even if you had done so.
Thirdly, I did just use you as a jumping off point, entirely reasonably too. You made a deranged accusation that someone was a bot because they disagreed with you. So there we go.
edit: Alright I just went through your comment history and didn’t find an instance of you accusing someone you agreed with of being a bot. Guess you’re gonna have to prove me wrong by citing a comment where you do exactly that.
edit edit: holy shit I just saw you talk to another user like you knew them personally. Talking about them having a bad reputation “around here” LMAO. You think this is some sort of personal interaction?
Removed by mod
Lmao you’re ridiculous, write some more please
Edit: Hey now I just forgot I didnt point you didnt back up your statement with proof. Quote me a comment or cut the shit
Removed by mod
No no, I did the thing you asked for! Now you have to do it. Bring proof or cut the shit! This is extremely serious and I am very tough!