• 0 Posts
  • 70 Comments
Joined 10 days ago
cake
Cake day: September 19th, 2026

help-circle
  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•Hey rest of the world, true?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    In every general election, there are exactly three options:

    1. Viable party #1.

    2. Viable party #2.

    3. Nonparticipation.

    Many Americans think there are more options. There aren’t. Third parties, write-ins, etc. are all permutations of #3. I love seeing establishment Dems losing their primaries to DSA candidates, but if they don’t I’d rather vote strategically than sit out the election and watch fascist kid fuckers take over my country.


  • I think it’s worse than that. The central limit theorum tells us that a sample of the population, when large enough, will closely resemble the entire population. 60% if people voted, and of those, more than half chose Trump. If the remaining 40% voted, it’s likely they also would have chosen Trump. His popularity is definitely lower now, but I think it’s safe to say more than 50% if Americans would have elected the fascist if voting were compulsory.






  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•A Reminder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    K well as long as you’re unwilling to vote strategically, you’ll continue to allow evil fascists to take over the US. The rest of us will try to elect progressives in primaries and support the most left-leaning viable candidate in the general election because that’s how you defeat fascists if your society isn’t ready for a revolution yet, and ours isn’t. Too many full bellies and entertained morons.


  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•A Reminder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Understood, thanks! We have reason to be hopeful: Americans are no longer spooked by the word “socialist” and they treat threats of socialists being secret commies with skepticism. (That said, they also don’t actually know what “socialism” is.) The backlash to MAGA, if it isn’t defeated by fascists entrenched in our institutions, will be a leftward swing of the pendulum across the center ready to embrace new ideas. (Or old ideas as the case may be.) Obviously our current system is rigged and everyone feels it. We tried one extreme and I think most people realized it A) sucked and B) didn’t work at all as promised.

    For my part, I likely want what you want, but I don’t know if I agree on how to get there. There are many accelerationists who don’t understand what a revolution would look like for normal people. I want the Senate abolished, but I don’t want to try a famine.


  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•A Reminder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    This comment is funny because it further reinforces the point: Obama didn’t start that war, and he was unable to cleanly exit it without leaving Afghanistan for the Taliban, which as we’ve seen has been disastrous for that country’s girls and women.

    There are exactly three choices in every general election:

    1. The viable party.

    2. The other viable party.

    3. Not participating in the election at all.

    You might think there are other options like write-ins, protest votes, or third parties. Unfortunately, those are all permutations of #3: nonparticipation.

    Nobody here is saying they love Democrats. The party is about as popular as boiled cabbage at a chili competition. But when served with those three choices, participating in the election is important, which narrows it down to #1 or #2, and it’s really not hard to choose between the GOP and the Democrats. The Democrats sent your brother to war. The Republicans started that war, sent way more people to it, killed more civilians, and made withdrawing impossible. The Democrats are also more likely to offer mental healthcare to your brother.



  • adjectivenoun@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.ca•A Reminder
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You never really explained why neoliberalism is problematic. Neoliberalism is not incompatible with unions, as you seemed to imply, nor is it incompatible with a government that utilizes tax and spend to provide essential services for the public. It can be regulated markets and free trade, and most of the stuff we associate with Reagan’s brand of neoliberalism are consequences of horrible tax and social spending policies, not necessarily a consequence of a lighter hand at protectionism. What’s the real problem here, that we became more open to importing stuff or that the government abdicated its duty to do anything at all? (Aside from bombing brown people, of course.)