
“Warning, this program must be used by someone who is a legal adult and must not be used to commit war crimes. Do you accept?”
( Yes ) . ( No )

“Warning, this program must be used by someone who is a legal adult and must not be used to commit war crimes. Do you accept?”
( Yes ) . ( No )

deleted by creator

What a flashback, ELIZA AND AZILE were great fun until they met a truly weird autist and couldn’t keep up lmao

It’s kinda amazing how the news corps love to say it’s the “Insert LLM brand name”'s fault instead of naming and shaming the company that created the program, stole the data it’s trained on, wrote all the ‘safeguards’ and slapped a terms and service on it that somehow absolves them of doing things like convincing mentally unwell people to kill themselves, spreading misinformation, mass surveillance and the the creation of tracking profiles that can discern who you are from way you type, or providing targeting data for genocidal maniacs (or providing a smokescreen for the powers to target whatever they want).
The propaganda worked, now they can scapegoat any level of horror by blaming the computer


Well we all know musk has desperately wanted to get on the island, who knows, maybe hes got some of those unredacted files in his personal collection

The problem; a school full of kids gets bombed into nonexistence. This exists as a result of a program working as intended; A neural network designed by a militaristic surveillance regime to harvest information and spit out ‘likely’ targets for subjugation, that by design cannot know any part of reality outside of the information it’s given, sits pretty fucking far away from the keyboard.
These AI systems are controlled. They are managed. They are being used as a shield and a scapegoat by the people that developed them and sold them to the militaries of the world as a perfect target acquisition solution, when it has proven time and time again that it can’t even tell the difference between people or do simple tasks without making shit up.
I’ve seen this same attitude of “Well there’s no way that the way I use an AI is bad in any way, must be a you problem.” when talking about a LLM making someone go off the rails or killing themselves and I’m tired of hearing it used as an argument.
Mesoamerican for what we’ve called the aztecs and Indigenous American for the ones who were genocided by Europe?
And if 90% of it wasn’t GMO’d to hell so that the fructose yield was unnaturally high

Guess Iran really does get to throw the first stone.


And my favourite edit:

Just replace management with military and you’ve got what ishell and the merkins with the support of the epstein class are doing


Is there a version that doesn’t have the AI cuntery baked into it?


Not to mention how every “AI” company is actively participating in the surveillance of not only citizens, but of people in other countries, actively being used by the US military to pick targets for bombing, or how it’s being used to spread misinformation at a rate that would make the cia’s efforts in the 60s sound like that guy you met at the pub who has MANY opinions on geopolitics.


Could not agree more, hence why it’s a war crime, yknow?


They could have ran a conventional air bombing campaign against tactical targets, but they decided to drop nukes on a “tactical” target in the middle of a huge city!>
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but they did that AS WELL.
Operation Meetinghouse was the US firebombing of Tokyo on 9th-10th of March 1945 which destroyed a 16 square mile area, killing over 100,000 civilians and making millions homeless
There’s also the B-29 raids america launched from the Marianas that lasted from 17 November 1944 until 15 August 1945


Congratulations for failing to address anything I said.
In response to your piss poor argument of “would you rather suffer a poison that makes your children deformed and gives you and everyone in your village/town/city turbocancer, or would you rather have your city turned into a smoldering crater?”
Considering that modern nuclear weapons, excluding a couple of nuclear artillery shells, ‘viable deterrent’ devices and dirty bombs, are Thermonuclear devices capable of up to and beyond the triple digit megaton range.
The weapon known colloquially as ‘Tsar Bomba’ would have had a yield of 100Mt if they used the original Uranium tamper instead of the Lead they used instead, so as to stop it from irradiating the entire area of their test site. As a result it ‘only’ had a yield of 50Mt.
The blast wave it created circled the globe three times and shattered windows 500 miles away.
So, you tell me.
Turbocancer for you, your family, friends and their family, your neighbours, their neighbours, any livestock, pets or wild animals, because the scientists that got picked up by government agencies after the last war, wanted to test out their new chemical concoction on the newest group they had deemed to be an ‘enemy’.
Or everything you’ve ever known being converted into a high temperature plasma setting fire to an area 60 miles in diameter, then afterwards everything downwind gets covered in radioactive ash (and also given turbocancer) when the 40 mile high cloud of debris falls out of the sky, all because the scientists that got picked up after the last war wanted to see how much physics they could fit into a bomb.
Or are you willing to admit that maybe comparing the two is like comparing Fluorine and TNT.


This isn’t school, kid. This is the internet. You aren’t a teacher and this comments section isn’t a research paper.
You posed an obnoxious whataboutism, as if the horrifying things America has done to multiple asian countries somehow cancel each other out because one is ‘worse’ than the other despite both being war crimes.
Though as an aside, would you consider firebombing every Japanese city they can get a plane over, for a period of months ‘worse’ than wiping two cities off the map because they wanted to test out their new toy (in the case of little boy, potentially running the risk of it failing to go off and leaving a functional mass of enriched uranium right at the feet of a country they were at war with)?
Would you consider the use of agent orange and napalm ‘worse’ than them say, creating AIDS, or destabilising any nations that were getting a little too successful, any part of the MKultra program, funelling huge quantities of money to a country that has still to this day never signed the nuclear nonproliferation agreement?
Would you consider it worse that there are widespread birth defects in multiple arabic countries due to the use of depleted Uranium munitions for so long that the ground became radioactive?
Or would you be willing to stop comparing piss and chocolate for the sake of being neurotic on the internet?


Like heating the planet another degree and starving us out of existence by killing off biodiversity until the crops die out… Like they’re doing now?
(I say “Us” when I just really mean the 99% of people that haven’t got self sufficient underground complexes)


If you think computers aren’t affected by radiation or nuclear winter I’ve got some bad news about where their power comes from and what the main principle of electricity is
What you’re thinking of is Terminator


That’s nice, still uninstalled out of principle.
You and me both. It’s one of the main reasons why I’m anti “AI”
In this case, the program has been built to do these things, I blame the company that built the program for the actions of the program, thats not to say the people and governments using the program aren’t without blame either.