fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agoJust one more square bromander.xyzimagemessage-square119linkfedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageJust one more square bromander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square119linkfedilink
minus-squarewonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoLiterally already addressed that, but go off You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don’t argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.
Literally already addressed that, but go off