• wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Literally already addressed that, but go off

    You raised the packing coefficient by ⅝ to squeeze one extra square in with all that wasted space, so don’t argue that 25 squares has a packing coefficient of 5. Another ⅜ will get you an extra 8 squares, and no wasted space.