eicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoSam Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientists: Sure, Sam.futurism.comexternal-linkmessage-square138linkfedilinkarrow-up1505arrow-down125
arrow-up1480arrow-down1external-linkSam Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientists: Sure, Sam.futurism.comeicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square138linkfedilink
minus-squarebaldingpudenda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 days agoI’m sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you, as well.
minus-squaregenerallynonsensical@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·5 days agoYou can lead a man to knowledge, but you can’t make him think.
minus-squareJohnSmith@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 days agoSomehow I’ve not seen this before. Love it!
minus-squareembed_me@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoLove it but still using “horse” for a more gender neutral jibe.
minus-squareLogi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days ago You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can’t make them think. We have a grammar for that.
minus-squareLogi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoSure. But that wasn’t the stated goal.
I’m sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you, as well.
You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can’t make him think.
Somehow I’ve not seen this before. Love it!
Love it but still using “horse” for a more gender neutral jibe.
We have a grammar for that.
Horse is more derogatory
So can man be
Sure. But that wasn’t the stated goal.