These math breakthroughs happened by throwing tens of thousands of agents at a problem to cover all possible angles (with tools developed by other mathematicians) costing the same amount of money as hiring ten top tier mathematicians for several years. Not saying it is not impressive, but not “AI can replace sciencetists” level impressive.
Just because AI is smarter than Sam Altman doesn’t mean it’s smarter than top scientists. Especially considering Sam is just about as smart as a pile of horseshit.
Sam, just because the digital parrot outsmarts you, it does not need to be intelligent.
Yawn. Wake me up when AI cures all cancers.
Is that sister fucking Sam Altman?
But apparently not smarter than CEOs or these con artists would all fuck off.
The more pants-on-head crazy the claims are, the more desperate they are.
I believe AI is smarter than Sam Altman.
Sam Altman believes he is smarter than scientists.
I asked AI if it’s smarter than scientists, and it said no. So if Sam says I should trust AI, Sam is full of shit.
I belive it as soon as they replace Scam Altman with AI as CEO and report postive growth and income for at last the next 10 Years.
But CEO’s are much more smarterer than scientists!
If scientists are so smart, why don’t they have any money?
Don’t tell me they value something other than “number go up” because I won’t understand you.
I don’t know, how is this any different than saying Wikipedia knows more than any human on earth? Ok, so you’re computer program has a bunch of information, who cares?
Now we flipped the house and senate, I hope we get some common sense guard rails for AI.
Please Sam, put the AI in charge of your company. Pretty please
If he really believed what he said, he would. But he knows he’s just talking shit
deleted by creator
AI spits out whatever it finds on the internet. I guess you could say that’s smart if you’re being obtuse about it…
Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.
If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.
911, I’d like to report a murder.
High-fiving AI. i’m done with this fucking place.
To be fair to AI, the problem with Sam and OpenAI was always PEBKAC.
I’m sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you, as well.
You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can’t make him think.
Somehow I’ve not seen this before. Love it!
Love it but still using “horse” for a more gender neutral jibe.
You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can’t make them think.
We have a grammar for that.
Horse is more derogatory
Sure. But that wasn’t the stated goal.
So can man be
I feel like if sam just fucked off. Ai would be smarter, more useful, and less problematic basically over night.
Maybe it could explain to Sam how a statistical model cannot approximate 101% accuracy to the sample data.
