Heidegger thinks about tools like so: a tool is something (a thing that has being in the Heideggerian sense, not necessarily an object) that represents an extension of human capabilities in some way. A tool is thus any kind of thing that *lets you do something you wouldn't otherwise have been able to*. The important (for us) conceptual leap here is that when a tool works well, or isn't broken, it develops what Heidegger describes as a "ready-to-hand" quality: the tool fades into the background as a kind of human-tool gestalt of a human with the additional capability afforded by a tool forms. As a simple example of this, consider eating with a fork. When the fork is well-designed and not broken, *you don't explicitly have "I am using a fork" in your conscious mind while eating dinner*.
AI is basically a drive through window library where the books are stolen and the librarian answers your questions about the subjects covered in those books by using a ouija board to composed the answers. Maybe the librarian would be one of those special people with photographic memory who turns their eyes upwards pretending to comoute something in their eye sockets before answering. But every so often they get a twitch or a full body convultion.
AI is basically a drive through window library where the books are stolen and the librarian answers your questions about the subjects covered in those books by using a ouija board to composed the answers. Maybe the librarian would be one of those special people with photographic memory who turns their eyes upwards pretending to comoute something in their eye sockets before answering. But every so often they get a twitch or a full body convultion.