Sorry, would you have preferred if I copy-pasted the link, so you could feel like your thoughts were unique? Also: An ad hominem isn’t just when you get insulted, dumbass
Sorry, but insulting you isn’t dismissing the argument. Dismissing the argument also isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem is when the character of the person making the argument is attacked as a way of attacking the argument. As I’ve already spelled out for you and you’re too stupid to understand: “You suck” is not an ad hominem. “You suck and therefore your argument sucks” is an ad hominem. “Your argument sucks” also isn’t an ad hominem, since you would’ve otherwise been called out for it ages ago.
Finally, I haven’t dismissed the argument, I have addressed it. You are just not the first one to make it, so I won’t rewrite the same argument to coddle your sensitivities. The only dismissing arguments here is you, since you are the one insistent on not engaging with the text given to you.
Anyways, learn what words mean and stop supporting fascists 😊
“Huh, when I said some stupid shit, that seemed to annoy you huh? Wow I sure have you now huh?”
I know you’re not used to interacting with people, but it’s actually pretty normal to get annoyed when someone says something stupid. Don’t think I don’t notice you trying to use this cringelord refrain to move on from you not understanding an ad hominem.
Let me know what wasn’t coherent in the text addressing your statements.
Sorry, a miswritten link to the front page of Google is sadly not equivalent to:
Understanding rhetorical fallacies
Written text directly addressing, among others, the arguments you have made
And again, this is still a sad and obvious attempt to move on from you speaking on something you do not understand. And likewise with you being unable to to point out what wasn’t coherent.
Sorry, would you have preferred if I copy-pasted the link, so you could feel like your thoughts were unique? Also: An ad hominem isn’t just when you get insulted, dumbass
You are dismissing the argument by addressing the person instead of the claims, which you did. Textbook.
PS: if you feel the need to insult people online you might have anger issues, maybe touch some grass?
Sorry, but insulting you isn’t dismissing the argument. Dismissing the argument also isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem is when the character of the person making the argument is attacked as a way of attacking the argument. As I’ve already spelled out for you and you’re too stupid to understand: “You suck” is not an ad hominem. “You suck and therefore your argument sucks” is an ad hominem. “Your argument sucks” also isn’t an ad hominem, since you would’ve otherwise been called out for it ages ago.
Finally, I haven’t dismissed the argument, I have addressed it. You are just not the first one to make it, so I won’t rewrite the same argument to coddle your sensitivities. The only dismissing arguments here is you, since you are the one insistent on not engaging with the text given to you.
Anyways, learn what words mean and stop supporting fascists 😊
Which is exactly what you did…
No, I just insulted you. Learn the difference you idiot. And I did it after having given you text addressing your argument. Idiot.
I must have struck a nerve, huh? Breathe deeply and count to five, maybe then you’ll calm enough to make a coherent argument.
“Huh, when I said some stupid shit, that seemed to annoy you huh? Wow I sure have you now huh?”
I know you’re not used to interacting with people, but it’s actually pretty normal to get annoyed when someone says something stupid. Don’t think I don’t notice you trying to use this cringelord refrain to move on from you not understanding an ad hominem.
Let me know what wasn’t coherent in the text addressing your statements.
Here’s a link proving you wrong
Sorry, a miswritten link to the front page of Google is sadly not equivalent to:
And again, this is still a sad and obvious attempt to move on from you speaking on something you do not understand. And likewise with you being unable to to point out what wasn’t coherent.