Because we know farmers and hear it directly from them. Do you know how they say if you have to explain yourself, you are already losing? Your right and should hold that opinion until the day you die.
The USSR was socialist, workers controlled the state and social ownership was the principal aspect of the economy. Communism is stateless, but not without administration, so when you use words like “government” not being in communism you cause confusion.
Removed by mod
How do you idiots become so supremely confident about topics you clearly have not done the slightest amount of research on
Because we know farmers and hear it directly from them. Do you know how they say if you have to explain yourself, you are already losing? Your right and should hold that opinion until the day you die.
Are you fucking stupid?
They misspelled corporate. I think combined with their logic here, we have enough evidence to determine that they are.
When you can’t make an argument, you attack the person. God forbid that you make a spelling mistake on your phone,
When you can’t make an argument, you delete your comment, and then pretend like it had a tangible argument in it to begin with
Removed by mod buddy, I own my opinions.
Ah, fair point, I must have misread
It would be communist if there was an intention that the government ownership would provide for all, and not just the extremely wealthy.
THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT IN COMMUNISM, THIS IS STATE RUN CAPITALISM JUST LIKE THE USSR.
IF THERE ARE PEOPLE ORGANIZING TOGETHER, THERE IS A GOVERNMENT. GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMICS ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS.
COMMUNISM IS “STATE-LESS”, NOT WITHOUT GOVERNMENT. YOU CAN HAVE A GOVERNMENT WITHOUT HAVING A STATE STRUCTURE.
The USSR was socialist, workers controlled the state and social ownership was the principal aspect of the economy. Communism is stateless, but not without administration, so when you use words like “government” not being in communism you cause confusion.