• 1dalm@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah the dude is really wrong.

      Your body is good at filtering out hydrophilic toxins. But for just about every other toxin… Not so much. Most hydrophobic toxins and other toxins, like heavy metals, VOCs, pesticides, micro plastics, etc., are man made and your body hasn’t had millions of years to evolve natural filters.

    • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They’ve detected microplastics in breast milk. You know what that means? It’s time to start living up to our name as mammals.

      We hormonally induce lactation for everyone. All the time. Just leech out those microplastics. Nips into 3d printers.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I walked into my break room at work a couple of years ago and overheard some of my female coworkers complaining about the formula shortage. I asked if they’d ever thought about breastfeeding and they looked at me like I’d just grown a second head. I get that some women here and there might need a supplement for this, but the idea that feeding babies canned formula should be the norm is completely insane.

        • m0darn@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Breast feeding is a huge amount of work, asking a person to do that and have a job is a big deal. Pumping breastmilk is incompatible with lots of jobs. If they have already stopped breastfeeding they may not be able to restart.

          It would be great to live in a society where breastfeeding was normal and easy. Society is crazy and women shouldn’t be criticised for trying to exist within it.

      • nightshade@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Those are also worth taking into account. Mercury in seafood, for example. Some can be excreted by the human body, others can’t.

      • methodicalaspect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Heavy metal is good for you. Gets you moving and can be cathartic. I prefer stoner, doom, or deathcore myself though. Load my body up with those types of metal.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, what do people mean “toxins are pseudoscience”?

        What are microplastics, heavy metals, and PTFAs, then???

        • Redjard@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          In serious, most ways to loose blood and need blood infusions will loose the plastics too, so the donated blood just maintains the concentrations, the samw way it does for the other components.
          Everyone has plastics in their blood.

          But then if you donate frequently your blood will have lower concentrations due to all the previous donations, so don’t just donate, donate often.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      AFAIK, still no conclusive studies that show microplastics having an overly adverse affect on the human body. I’ve seen one linking it to lower sperm counts, but that’s not particularly bad to me. We don’t need more people.

      The big scare with microplastics is that they are everywhere and that certainly isn’t good; and I think we’re all just waiting for the shoe to drop and some study to come out that shows something majorly negative with them. But for now, there’s nothing obvious sticking out that shows an immediate concern. Which makes sense. We use plastic for so much because it tends not to react to stuff.

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Because they are so ubiquitous that it is impossible to find a control group. Quite literally every single person on the planet has micro plastics in them.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        AFAIK, still no conclusive studies that show microplastics having an overly adverse affect on the human body

        The problem is that we’ll never know because there’s no control group. Everybody has them, even fetuses still in the womb. You would have to build bunkers with perfect air filtering, and then go through, like, four generations of humans to breed microplastics-free specimen, which you could then use a the control group for the rest… Only them never leaving the bunker would already invalidate the tests… So, yeah…

        • 1dalm@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If micro plastics were a problem then we should expect to see rapid increases in cancers in younger adults.

          Handed a note

          Huh. No shit.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Though even that is complicated by 50 or so years of nuclear weapons testing, which likely also increased cancer rates. Not to mention all that lead everywhere. Produce gradually losing nutrients because farming mostly just focuses on the big three with fertilizer and the others are being mined out of the ground and sent to landfills, septic tanks, waste processing facilities, cemetaries, and crematoriums also doesn’t help (though I’m not sure waste processing and crematoriums remove those nutrients from the cycle like the others, since the one could produce fertilizer and the other might be sending it out into the atmosphere where it could eventually end up back in the soil).

            There’s so much chaos that it’s hard to isolate causes, which then makes all the causes kinda “hide in plain sight” because they can perpetually blame the others and shit only gets worse over time.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        We haven’t noticed much in the way of short term effects, but there’s no way to know what long term effects there will be except to wait.

        In the meantime, since the effects are… unlikely to be beneficial, the best thing to do is reduce exposure as much as possible.

    • nightshade@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Good point, those exist. I don’t think we know yet what all of the consequences are, but they’re obviously not good for us.