fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoJust like me frmander.xyzimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1269arrow-down111
arrow-up1258arrow-down1imageJust like me frmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 days agoDoes this mean that tube socks are not, in fact, tubes? If there is a second hole in the sock, does that change things? I have a lot to consider now.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days ago second hole You mean the first hole
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoNo, all socks have at least one hole in them.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI mean topologically no, since sock is equivalent to some flat surface. And to your original question, when you put a hole in the sock, it does become a tube. And a tubr can be seen as a surface with one hole
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoYou haven’t seen my socks
Does this mean that tube socks are not, in fact, tubes?
If there is a second hole in the sock, does that change things?
I have a lot to consider now.
You mean the first hole
No, all socks have at least one hole in them.
I mean topologically no, since sock is equivalent to some flat surface.
And to your original question, when you put a hole in the sock, it does become a tube. And a tubr can be seen as a surface with one hole
Socks are just disks
You haven’t seen my socks