This is such a weird article. It seems to be utterly bewildered by the idea of a simple toy like this that has existed for centuries, like it’s a revolutionary concept that something doesn’t have AI integration or whatever marketing buzzword is apparently necessary to enjoy anything. It’s baffling.
And yes, $35 seems a bit steep for this sort of thing, but I’m just blown away by how noteworthy the author thinks this nothing is.
So it serves two purposes beyond the collectible factor? Great observation.
This is such a weird article. It seems to be utterly bewildered by the idea of a simple toy like this that has existed for centuries, like it’s a revolutionary concept that something doesn’t have AI integration or whatever marketing buzzword is apparently necessary to enjoy anything. It’s baffling.
And yes, $35 seems a bit steep for this sort of thing, but I’m just blown away by how noteworthy the author thinks this nothing is.