You must log in or # to comment.
no practical purpose beyond a built-in clock and a temperature sensor
So it serves two purposes beyond the collectible factor? Great observation.
This is such a weird article. It seems to be utterly bewildered by the idea of a simple toy like this that has existed for centuries, like it’s a revolutionary concept that something doesn’t have AI integration or whatever marketing buzzword is apparently necessary to enjoy anything. It’s baffling.
And yes, $35 seems a bit steep for this sort of thing, but I’m just blown away by how noteworthy the author thinks this nothing is.
Idk I think not buying a product from a giant corporation will do more for the world than buying it.

