💯

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Just use sponsorblock, uBlock, privacyBadger, Dearrow, consentomatic and that one that blocks the JS LAN scans (port authority?)

    • Ugandan Airways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      The cause is to separate you from your money and time. To reinforce and promote capital as the ultimate gatekeepers.

    • racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      advertising is forcing you to pay with your time and attention. I started hating all kinds of ads when I first flew with Ryanair. There aren’t headphones big enough to withstand two and a half hours of uninterrupted bullshit

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 days ago

    Ad-blocking is a property right. I have every right to control what my device does or does not display, by definition of ownership. Conversely, advertisers or other parties attempting to colonize my device by forcing it to display something against my (the owner’s) will is a hostile act that violates my rights.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Except we are beginning to not own what we own. The computer is yours, the software is just licensed, and they are trying to take everything away from us, from ovens to washing machines, they want to make it all subscription, spying on us, and serving us ads. We don’t have the right to repair the products when we break, and it’s a federal felony to “break” any sort of digital lock on a device, and I think to change it’s programming too.

      That said, it’s a moot point as of yet, because while websites forced me to whitelist their sites to use them when I had adblock, I was told about ublockorigin, and I see no ads, and the sites can’t tell I am using it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        the software is just licensed

        That is a GODDAMN LIE perpetrated by copyright cartel shysters to swindle all of us. The entire legal theory that assertion rests on is absolute nonsense: they want to pretend that you “need” to accept an “EULA” to use the software because otherwise copying it from the installation media onto your hard drive and/or into RAM would be a violation, but that is wrong because 17 U.S. Code § 117 (a) (1) carves out an explicit exception that allows it. EULAs are bunk and do not constitute a valid contact, as they not only lack ‘acceptance’ because they attempt to work on adhesion (trying to impose new terms after-the-fact when the transaction to obtain the copy has already occurred and concluded), but fail to provide any meaningful ‘consideration’ to begin with!

        They can pry my hardware and software that I own from my cold, dead hands.

      • Quantenteilchen@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Sadly, and I am not a lawyer so this is not even close to legal advice(!!), “beginning” is potentially the wrong word when talking about licenses due to copyright. Because even a single flipped bit in RAM on your computer could be constructed as a copyright infringement if pushed in a legal battle and decided in a court. (This all sounds squishy because, again, I am not a lawyer and as far as I know nothing of this sort has had clear ground setting or breaking rulings yet…)

        Why am I of this opinion despite also usually loving to take the “my device my rules stance”? Because I got to proof read some final exams for legal professionals-to-be for their technical accuracy and let me tell you: the most likely legal outcome they saw was not good for most of us. (So now I really really hope that some high up court rules on a case like this and sides with “common sense” about what is and is not allowed with our owned hardware!)

    • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Thats fair if you also hold the stance that they can block you if you aren’t paying to use the service. But i doubt you do.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        What fucking “service?” Software running locally on my own computer isn’t a goddamned “service” to begin with!

        Also, fuck off with your bullshit assumption of bad faith.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you. You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity. Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head. You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.

    Banksy

    • jafra@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Nice point if view. Ironically we live in times when minding others boundaries is almost common sense. Abusive behavior gets public contempt. But everyone is just accepting manipulative, malicious and intrusive ads.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      There’s a giant, glowing, animated LED billboard along a main road near my house that had a PSA about distracted driving on it the other day. It made me angry.

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    If you want to actively shit on them, there is AdNauseam, which is a fork of uBlock Origin but in addition to blocking the ads, it clicks on absolutely everything, sending fake signals. Polluting their database is costing them money and they have to deal with all the noise.

    Not for everyone, but definitely an active hostility towards these fucks.

      • agingelderly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        As someone who works in marketing - they will tote these clicks as a great success and continue to do what they are doing, maybe even more so, but will be distraught by the lack of follow through when it comes to sales. I guess if it happened long enough, And on a big enough scale, they might eventually give up but it would take years

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      That seems like it opens the door to a lot of security issues. Part of the reason to use uBlock is that ads are a known threat vector.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        All clicks are performed in an isolated sandbox separate from the user area (basically imagine the click register signal going out, but nothing more).

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          What if you have a multi layered ad blocking setup where you’re using ublock origin and pi.hole and a VPN with blocking?

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            The multiple layers of redundancy would likely clash with Adnauseum, yeah. Although that probably is just wasted compute - you may only need one or two of those solutions to have effective adblocking (uBlock for supported browsers, pi.hole for devices unable to have uBlock installed) rather than all 3 at once.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Well I’m not gonna bother turning off any of the layers when I’m out and about. Like, my laptop still needs ublock when I’m not at home. And the vpn is just for certain use cases.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  I have tailscale set up. I’m not gonna have my wife be using tailscale. And I’m also not going to be using tailscale all the time. I even have an exit node on my server.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    If you have to react to advertising you’re already doing it wrong. If it’s able to reach you on your hardware in any form, you’ve already failed.

  • corvus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I moved to Linux, use Freetube, LineageOS on the phone, listen all day to internet radios from the command line, browser with uBlock add on and it’s been years since I saw or listened an ad.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I used to think anti-consumerism was a lot more popular. It’s a significant disconnect from how I thought people are. Apparently I took more media related courses in high school and university than most people do.

    One thing that continued to confuse me is how tech cultures are unrepentantly consumer capitalists. The earlier times of the world wide web was very counter-culture. So it’s been an unending source of befuddlement how tech nerds have been deep-throating the adtech boot.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    my kids have grown up with my adblocked version of the internet, when they connect to other internet thats not a filtered feed they get annoyed by ads in their games and on their videos

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      My wife initially hated my piholes, because they broke some of her phone’s stuff. She runs stock Samsung Android, so lots of the built in Google stuff got broken. She was constantly complaining about it. We eventually spent an evening hunt-and-peck’ing the various blocked DNS requests, to see which ones were required for her phone to work properly, and which ones were just Google Adsense BS. Got her set up with a WireGuard VPN connection that automatically activates when she’s disconnected from the home WiFi, so she’s always protected.

      Now that she’s used to it, it’s like a wake up slap whenever she encounters ads. We moved a while ago, and all of my more advanced networking stuff (including the pihole) was sitting in a box until I had time to set it all up. She suddenly started seeing ads again, and was absolutely gobsmacked at how pervasive they are. What really sent her over the edge was when our Roku TV was paused, and went to its idle screen. The idle screen is an auto-scrolling image, and it had an ad plastered across the scrolling image. She was like “what the fuck we’re not even watching anything right now! It’s just idle! Why the hell are they advertising to us on the damned idle screen??” That was what finally pushed her to give me an evening to set all of the networking stuff back up.

  • amos@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Another word for “marketing” or “advertisement” is Manipulation. Shady, manipulative, tactics.

    Fuck them. I love Lemmy because it seems like the ratio of like-minded people is much larger here. Nothing better than seeing other principled people that would rather give up some comforts than deal with ads and bend the knee to the pieces of shit that try to push them.

    Even products in the supermarket (such as bread!!) come with ads in the fucking plastic wrapper. I have changed my bread brand due to this. I will absolutely give up any comfort to avoid your manipulation. I will fucking shower in cold water if it means I don’t bend the knee to pieces of shit.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Another word for “marketing” or “advertisement” is Manipulation.

      Don’t worry they’ve solved that, it’s called 🩷 𝐼𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒾𝓃𝑔 😎. That’s much less ominous! They just influence!