A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for $44 billion. But it absolved him of some fraud allegations, finding that he did not “scheme” to mislead investors.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s it, again?

    JAIL TIME!

    If I steal a bread to feed my hungry children I’ll go to jail, but this guy ficks around with billions and all he gets is a tiny slap on his fingers?

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    7 days ago

    For the rest of us, there would be a seizure of assets and a prison term.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Basically, and it’s not even like this is a corporation that has some level of money machine go burr, it’s straight up one man who did this and is responsible it should be cut and dry and he should be spending the next few decades in prison.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I don’t understand why these courts charge a set fine for stuff like this. This is clearly an extremely unique case. The man is 20% shy of being a trillionaire.

    What really needs to be done is they need to charge a percentage of his profits. Say 20 to 30%.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This idea needs to be fine tuned. The problem is that parasitic oligarchs don’t have a real income.

      For those who don’t know, the parasite oligarchs take the vast amount of stock that they own and take it to a bank. The bank gives the parasite a loan with the stock as collateral. Right off the vat, the parasite gets to claim debt on their taxes. The parasite will then take the loan and use it to buy more stock or companies or anything that generates more wealth.

      Loan gets paid off with the generated wealth. Due to generous tax loop holes put into place by politicians). The parasite gets to claim that they didn’t make any money and get a tax bill of zero and sometimes a refund.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        This scheme is called “buy, borrow, die.” It’s legal. The stocks are typically not sold off, so capital gains taxes are avoided. Loans and debt are not taxable. It’s effectively profit with relatively low risk. The point is that the level of entry is extremely high. One must already have large amounts of money to qualify for these kinds of loans.

        The problem, of course, is that if you start taxing debt, like people taking out loans, it’s not just going to be millionaires, as you called them “parasites,” paying those taxes. It will be everybody taking out a loan, including the poor and the middle class.

        The proposed solution is to tax people based on net worth. If you’re worth above a certain amount, then you get taxed at a very high percentage.

        With that being said, if that were the case and Elon Musk were taxed like this, he would only pay around $12–$13 billion out of the roughly $800 billion he already has. In essence, it would still be pocket change to him.

        At this point, wealthy people not paying taxes has become a kind of game, who can pay the least.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      What really needs to be done is they need to charge a percentage of his profits. Say 20 to 30%.

      Lol. That’s not how the state serves capitalism. Fixed fines!!! Gotta put the burden the poor every time.

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh No, point 2 % of his net worth

    0.2%

    literally less than a traffic ticket in terms of scale

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean I dislike the guy as much as you, but almost all of his “wealth” is paper wealth. He may very well not be able to liquidate 2% of his wealth (fine with me).

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes of course. But a lot of it ain’t vested and so the terms may not be great or downright unpalatable.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Point is that if I commit fraud or steal anything over 10 dollars I might go to jail

        This guy lies steals and cheats by the billions and he gets a hug

        Jail the motherfucker already

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Paper wealth and theoretical wealth, he will have to borrow that $2B using paper value as collateral.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Cool, so when this reaches Appeals court (which is where it’s absolutely going next because they’ll definitely appeal it), that 2.1B$ fine will get knocked down to 10$ and a blowjob (for Elon).

    But hey, the Washington Post or whatever can get a nice little headline out of it where they pretend billionaires face any sort of punishment in this Capitalist hellscape for 5 seconds so that’s nice.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be clear, the punishment wasn’t him loosing 2B, he wouldn’t even notice the difference. The punishment was being told he was wrong by a jury of his “peers”.

    • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      This does not work because he will find a way to have 0 income (legally). I don’t know how we can make the billionaires pay, but we should tax the assets not the incomes.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Is this your first time in capitalism? That’s how every fine works. There are no punishments for the privileged.

      The president is a pedophile who has been prosecuted for like 30 felonies. They’re not fining the creep at all. That’s reality.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s the problem with Mr. musketeer he doesn’t actually show income. That’s why we’re always complaining about how billionaires don’t pay income tax.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It should be the amount he made from it + a fine. It’s how the middle class gets handled.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    He’s made billions more after and because of it so he doesn’t give a shit about a meaningless, billion dollar fine.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t know how much he has liquid. The article says that “most” of his 814B is tied up in Tesla stock. Selling a couple of billion worth of stock isn’t trivial.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    So the public paid to see another billionaire do things nobody else can do and get away with it. Nice.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wasn’t invested in Twitter, but when I heard he was trying to get out of it I bought some stock. I knew he couldn’t get out of the deal because it doesn’t work like that and he’s a dumb ass.

    My only regret was not buying more. Thanks for the money, idiot.