





I’m genuinely curious what you’re trying to accomplish by continuing to circumvent the rules, ignoring mod requests?
Now you’re resorting to posting a screenshot of a Der Spiegel article without the source or an excerpt. Again.
Perhaps you don’t understand why we do this: it is so people without ad blockers or using accessibility tools can read the article even if it is paywalled or was taken down after publication.
This is your 5th or 6th violation of our rules, resulting in a 7 day ban. The next one will be a permanent ban to this community.
People like you are why many mods on here permanently ban people upon the first violation.
Have they responded at all?
I haven’t received any DM from OP.
Thanks, just curious.
How can they? @kingofras@lemmy.world banned them. Why let them defend themselves when you can be no better than the Epstein Class and remove them?
God forbid a community about exposing the Epstein Class and the Files aligned with them bans someone from checks notes exposing abuse from the Epstein Class.
Also make sure to upvote this post. Not only to share more horrible information about Trump and Epstein, but to expose the moderators from silencing people from sharing information.
I understand you’re pissed off.
Read the rules in the sidebar. You’re now breaking one of them too.
Note no posts of OP have been removed to preserve the discussion, hence no silencing.
Rules have been in place for a while and these particular ones were added after community consultation.
If you disagree with the rules feel free to make a meta post in this community to make your case for the change, not by being disrespectful.
Thanks.
Bro. Think about what you said.
You’re comparing a volunteer mod to people who build child sex trafficking rings.
Reread what you wrote and think about it. Maybe consider apologizing.
You’re comparing a volunteer mod to people who build child sex trafficking rings.
You’re comparing @VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to… Just want to get this straight… As someone who is building sex trafficing rings?
Reread what you wrote and think about it.
I might suggest you do the same.
This is about a mod banning a user for sharing content about the Epstein Ring, publicly shaming them, and preventing them a public comment to defend themselves. The mod could have done this privately. They chose to announce their public censorship.
I’m not talking about anyone but you bud.
You’re the one who said this:
@kingofras@lemmy.world banned them. Why let them defend themselves when you can be no better than the Epstein Class and remove them?
I’m not talking about anyone but you bud.
Then why are you replying to me when I’m not saying a thing about you?
Maybe read my comment and try again.
Believe it or not on Lemmy, a public forum, we can see you reply to another commenter and read what you said to another commenter. But wait, people also can reply directly to you about what you said in that other comment. A threaded reply structure, both marvelous and dangerous.
Are we sure it’s not a bot account?
It’s behaving too intelligently for a bot. After its last ban it started posting only memes, which is fine and then crossposts for articles.
They occasionally comment too, but the post pattern reminds me of a reddit karma farmer.
Epstein and the island being shut down does not in any way mean any of this has stopped. Zero other rich pedophiles went to prison about it, so they literally know they can get away with it.
One even got elected president.
And his friends know he’s got their backs
The president doesn’t have friends, there are people that have information and power that can hurt him, that is why he is protecting them, either they have dirt on him, the ability to harm his interests, or are paying him off.
Epstein had a bigger island, and ships never stopped coming and going from it. They literally just moved the whole operation next door and put someone else in charge of it that no one’s heard of.
Really? You got sources for that? I haven’t heard that but I do not doubt it.
Wikipedia covers the island itself well enough https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Saint_James
Who is Stephen Deckoff and what’s he doing with both islands now? No one knows. He says he’s turning it into a world class resort and that he never met or knew Epstein. His big public renovations so far seem to be adding a new fire pit and repainting a building.
Update:
Just wanted to add a recent local news source I found that confirms Deckoff has only done weird, shady things on the islands like building a big warehouse.
Given how buddy buddy he was with tech, a lot simply moved online. They were using modeling to find victims, but now they probably just stalk IG and tiktok.
Republican voters and officials will continue to push for that cover up. They’re all complicit at this point, and they don’t care what anyone thinks about that.
The article from the screen cap. It seems to be paywalled partway through, and no remove paywall option is working for me.
Edit: Okay, take these with a grain of salt, but I did find a few articles which summarize this article for those who can’t read the whole thing. It’s the best I’ve got thus far.
https://www.rawstory.com/epstein-missing-model/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/missing-german-model-named-in-epstein-files/ar-AA25ofMg (This one has some of the most info, but is also an aggregate feed repost of the Daily Mail, so be extra sparing with your salt on this one.)
EDIT 2: As I was fetching these, u/OldBoy found a working paywall bypass link for this article: https://archive.md/20260612114906/https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-mystery-of-michele-a-missing-woman-from-germany-reappears-in-the-epstein-files-a-835c0c91-620c-4fd0-ac49-9870fe160108
Thanks. I don’t know why images alone are accepted when it comes to news.
Because people get a dopamine hit off of reading things that confirm their world view.
hey! don’t attack me like this!
Probably why this isn’t posted in !news. And then when it is posted there, people complain that the mods are pro Epstein because they removed the anti-Epstein image.
It’s the worst part of Lemmy, and I constantly report it, and comment that OP “accidentally” posted an image instead of the link. It’s such a useless post format.


So it is with great pleasure that I present you with the first of many revamps the “Revolution WOW” campaign will unveil over the next year. I give you the Buddy Mangione. Now that’s not the sanctioned term we’re using for the symbol, just something we’ve been kicking around the office, but look at it. Doesn’t it pop? Buddy Mangione!
Sweet Jesus do you have to use the whole can?
Who soiled your screenshot?
Here’s the original gif if you don’t have it
I only have the original link saved on my blahaj account (which is down rn) so I reuploaded it
I kind of want a print of this.
A shop in my neighborhood has this as those tall Jesus candles.
Bless you for this.
In case you needed some help.
Not dozens. Hundreds or thousands.
WHY would we go AFTER the Epstein Class when we could ELECT them and use TAXPAYER Money to CONTINUE Kidnapping Children INSTEAD?
-Republican Voters LITERALLY!
I remember the very moment I realized that republicans were disingenuous, and far too numerous.
Shortly after the Iraq invasion, and the “support the troops” ribbons started showing up.
Me, being logical, thought it meant people wanted the troops out, like, support bringing them home from a pointless war in the desert.
It did not.
I ran a small leather shop that sold hat/lapel pins. One pin said “stay the course” a slogan for continuing the Iraq war in 2006.
I started working in that shop in 2011. I left 15 years later. Never sold a single pin except to myself. I have it on my bag ironically. I’m Nearly 40 years old and we have been In perpetual war my entire life.
Jesus. The grief I feel for that poor girl and her family too, discovering her name here. Maxwell, Trump & the rest shouldn’t be going anywhere until all these kids are located.
Unfortunately almost all of them are in places of control and they make rules with loopholes so they can protect themselves if they are ever discovered and now there is only one way to deal with them now.
A few years ago, I mentioned that the prostitutes here in Seattle along Aurora Ave, seem about the right age as if they were trafficked during trump’s first term. They were about 16 to 19 years old. It used to be that the prostitutes weren’t that young seeming, maybe in their 20s and 30s? The trolling was swift. Not as heavy as if I mention how evil Roundup/Bayer/Monsanto is, but still it was quick.
No justice will be seen so long as Donald Trump and his supporters continue to cover it all up.
Trump knows. That’s why that limo driver kicked him out and wanted to beat his ass, the conversation he overheard from trump about missing girl
Serious question: Why is it often said “this or that appears on the Epstein files” and not in what context or what specifically is said about “this or that” in the files? Is it that everything else is censored where these names are mentioned?
Was this “young woman” under 18 when she was taken?
Actually, not this time. I can only read the first part of the article due to paywalls, but she was 22 when she disappeared (probably she was still either abducted or brought into Epstein’s network and then someone disappeared her, but I can’t read far enough in the article to see the details about the mentions of her. Anyone here have a Spiegel subscription who’s willing to share the relevant excerpts? Article here)
Does it matter? Human trafficking is shitty no matter what age it is done at.
I believe the comment here is because a lot of news articles about the Epstein Files will refer to trafficked underage girls as “underage women” or “young women,” a practice widely criticized for downplaying the fact that these victims were children. Kairos was asking with the expectation that this would be another of those cases, but this is one of the rare times when “young woman” is actually the accurate term, because the probable victim here was 22 at the time she disappeared. Human trafficking of anyone of any age is still, of course, awful.
Additionally, OP titled this “Human trafficking of little kids”, which is blatantly untrue in this case (as the article OP should have linked to would have made clear).
Agreed. That’s not what I asked.
Well let’s not forget the real problem for them is finding another way to do this and better.
The bar is laying flat on the ground. They’ve used their personal emails, unencrypted. They’ll probably argue a defense of being mentally challenged.
Hey man this is the country of dig deeper to make new lows.
What happened is not at all hard to comprehend. Fucking terrible people being terrible people. We need more rope