I’m genuinely curious what you’re trying to accomplish by continuing to circumvent the rules, ignoring mod requests?
Now you’re resorting to posting a screenshot of a Der Spiegel article without the source or an excerpt. Again.
Perhaps you don’t understand why we do this: it is so people without ad blockers or using accessibility tools can read the article even if it is paywalled or was taken down after publication.
This is your 5th or 6th violation of our rules, resulting in a 7 day ban. The next one will be a permanent ban to this community.
People like you are why many mods on here permanently ban people upon the first violation.
How can they? @kingofras@lemmy.world banned them. Why let them defend themselves when you can be no better than the Epstein Class and remove them?
God forbid a community about exposing the Epstein Class and the Files aligned with them bans someone from checks notes exposing abuse from the Epstein Class.
Also make sure to upvote this post. Not only to share more horrible information about Trump and Epstein, but to expose the moderators from silencing people from sharing information.
You’re comparing a volunteer mod to people who build child sex trafficking rings.
You’re comparing @VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to… Just want to get this straight… As someone who is building sex trafficing rings?
Reread what you wrote and think about it.
I might suggest you do the same.
This is about a mod banning a user for sharing content about the Epstein Ring, publicly shaming them, and preventing them a public comment to defend themselves. The mod could have done this privately. They chose to announce their public censorship.
Believe it or not on Lemmy, a public forum, we can see you reply to another commenter and read what you said to another commenter.
But wait, people also can reply directly to you about what you said in that other comment.
A threaded reply structure, both marvelous and dangerous.
@VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online
I’m genuinely curious what you’re trying to accomplish by continuing to circumvent the rules, ignoring mod requests?
Now you’re resorting to posting a screenshot of a Der Spiegel article without the source or an excerpt. Again.
Perhaps you don’t understand why we do this: it is so people without ad blockers or using accessibility tools can read the article even if it is paywalled or was taken down after publication.
This is your 5th or 6th violation of our rules, resulting in a 7 day ban. The next one will be a permanent ban to this community.
People like you are why many mods on here permanently ban people upon the first violation.
Have they responded at all?
I haven’t received any DM from OP.
Thanks, just curious.
How can they? @kingofras@lemmy.world banned them. Why let them defend themselves when you can be no better than the Epstein Class and remove them?
God forbid a community about exposing the Epstein Class and the Files aligned with them bans someone from checks notes exposing abuse from the Epstein Class.
Also make sure to upvote this post. Not only to share more horrible information about Trump and Epstein, but to expose the moderators from silencing people from sharing information.
I understand you’re pissed off.
Read the rules in the sidebar. You’re now breaking one of them too.
Note no posts of OP have been removed to preserve the discussion, hence no silencing.
Rules have been in place for a while and these particular ones were added after community consultation.
If you disagree with the rules feel free to make a meta post in this community to make your case for the change, not by being disrespectful.
Thanks.
Bro. Think about what you said.
You’re comparing a volunteer mod to people who build child sex trafficking rings.
Reread what you wrote and think about it. Maybe consider apologizing.
You’re comparing @VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to… Just want to get this straight… As someone who is building sex trafficing rings?
I might suggest you do the same.
This is about a mod banning a user for sharing content about the Epstein Ring, publicly shaming them, and preventing them a public comment to defend themselves. The mod could have done this privately. They chose to announce their public censorship.
I’m not talking about anyone but you bud.
You’re the one who said this:
Then why are you replying to me when I’m not saying a thing about you?
Maybe read my comment and try again.
Believe it or not on Lemmy, a public forum, we can see you reply to another commenter and read what you said to another commenter. But wait, people also can reply directly to you about what you said in that other comment. A threaded reply structure, both marvelous and dangerous.
Are we sure it’s not a bot account?
It’s behaving too intelligently for a bot. After its last ban it started posting only memes, which is fine and then crossposts for articles.
They occasionally comment too, but the post pattern reminds me of a reddit karma farmer.