YouTube viewers will soon have to sit through even longer ads, with Google rolling out new 30-second unskippable spots on a popular app.

    • dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I just purchased a new travel router that will have options for ad blocking built in. Would that block ads on any device sharing that connexion? TV, phone, PC, smart fridge,…?

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Those will not block YT ads.

        They’ll block ads at a DNS level, but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

        • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Those will not block YT ads.

          This is correct

          but YouTube ads are delivered directly into the video stream.

          This is false

            • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Sure, but that can be said about almost anything.

              Still, I’d be surprised if they went the route of embedding ads into the stream, in part because of measurability/skipability/etc. It’s definitely not out of the question, but I think we’re still ways to go before we get there.

              And even then, tools like yt-dlp would probably be able to apply some heuristics to figure out which segments are foreign to the stream and slice them out that way. Blocking yt-dlp would require DRM, which in turn requires changing the transcoding pipeline in a pretty non-trivial way. I also doubt they would willingly go this route.

        • ragas@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Youtubes ads are not delivered into the videostream. That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

          • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            That would mean reencodingevery video for every user and would need an insane amount of computing power.

            You actually don’t have to, on account of how adaptive video streaming works. It’s fully possible to serve a few segments of ad content mid-stream.

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t mind long ads in fact I am happy that they are unskippable. Too bad i don’t get any cause I block that shit.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Firefox with ublock origin for desktop and mobile. Grayjay for mobile (integrates Nebula too so you can get both your feeds at once). Android TV with FCast and Smart Tube Next for your TV. Never see ads again.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I recommend Peertube. There’s not much there yet, but myself and others are trying.

    Also, did you know you can upload your video to Peertube and have YouTube pull it via RSS? That’s what I’m doing!

    All of my stuff you’ll find on Peertube and I don’t have to do anything else to get it up on YouTube.

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        NoBOdY wIlL dO AnYThiNg wItHOuT PrOfiT mOtIvE

        This book, YouTube’s history, and the span of human history say otherwise. You’re spouting capitalist rhetoric which is ultimately a lie told to us on repeat to encourage greed, selfishness, and individualism.

        The platform you’re using right now was built without profit motive, there’s plenty of content. PeerTube can achieve the same.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Lots of people did it on YouTube for years. Even more on other platforms.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        This is a terrible take, as most content creators I watch already cannot survive off of Youtube ad revenue and rely on third-party monetization, like Patreon subscriptions.

        Besides the fact that plenty of people make content for free, from the simple love of creating something.

          • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t think it had prerolls during the flash days but it had banner ads as far back as I can remember

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well, no. It’s been losing money for years. But I doubt this will make it profitable.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s so fucking funny though. I would love to pay YouTube. But I will never pay a company that abuses my data the way they do.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or to come to terms with needing to pay for the services you use. YouTube has a paid option that supports the platform and creators much more that watching ads.

      Of course, I also upload my videos to PeerTube. Seems like the best alternative I’ve seen thus far.

      • anothermember@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I get a lot of value from YouTube that I would happily pay for, and I already pay for online services that respect me but I wouldn’t pay a company that treats users like they do. It’s not the ads I have a problem with, it’s the tracking of users. They could have ads on their website that don’t track users. You can subscribe to premium and presumably they don’t show you ads, but they still track you. If they didn’t do that I would happily pay them.