• BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s less efficient time-wise though, since it takes significantly longer to walk the same distance compared to riding.

      Ie, riding 2 hours burns FAR more calories than walking for 2 hours.

      • jeffep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I enjoy walking and don’t mind walking even for 40 minutes in the morning. Not every day, but if it fits in the schedule it gives me more movement in practice than a bike (also due to some local circumstances).

        The point was more generally that walking is a great alternative. Everyone hypes bicycles, walking has no lobby and is one of the healthiest things to add to your day.

        Also, if the goal is to lose weight, cardio is fine but only supportive at best. It’s way more effective to eat less calorie dense food than trying to run/bike it off. The difference between an hour walking and biking is negligible for most people compared to dietary changes.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The difference between and hour walking and biking is easily 10+ miles, not exactly negligible if you have somewhere to go.