You must log in or # to comment.
I literally cannot conceive of a more efficient arrangement of 17 monitors
As long as the monitors and space are squares and all monitors have the same side length
And the side of the space for monitors isn’t an integer multiple of the monitor side.
Why have many monitor when few monitor do trick?
Finally a screen wide enough to display a single error in Java.
Where are you getting so many 1:1 monitors?
deleted by creator
Here you go. 22 16:9 monitors.
I chose 22 monitors, because all other numbers have very expected results:
spoiler
17 monitors:
So what’s that gap for?
You can clearly either fit a few more, or make the total area smaller.You are right, actually. I blindly trusted the computer to figure this one out, but just looking at it I found a better solution by hand. Maybe there really are some better solutions for the 22 monitors problem.
spoiler
This better not end up in any scientific papers, ever.
To answer your question: fitting more monitors into these gaps would not result in the optimal placement for that amount of monitors. 23, 24, and 25 monitors all have “expected” results. And closing the remaining gap would not result in a smaller bounding box square.
Ideal aspect ratio for sudoku
Make sure to implement the arbitrary angles in your Wayland compositor.
Where can I buy this
Would Lemmy on Firefox look like this on the diagonal screens?
This slaps though! Where are all the diamond monitors at??
Hmm, that is kind of cool, in that you can have text on all 4 sides and it’s still generally readable. Not really possible for vertical panels…
where can I get square monitors?
2005
I cannot even conceive of how angles not based on 90° increments would render various things without issues. Or why you’d want that.
X11 already supports this lol
