• Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    With Gabe’s absurd amount of middleman tax money obtained by running the defacto PC games store monopoly, the solution is oddly simple: Just start a bank and become a payment processor.

    • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      A “de-facto” monopoly is not a monopoly. Competitors basically refused to innovate their stores beyond the MVP despite users pointing out the missing features. Epic pissed away a lot of money to buy traffic and then never did anything to keep it.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        For all the things I enjoy about GOG, I really wish they added an “ignore” button to games. Steam has had it for 10+ years now.

        Another thing I really wish they added is negative filters to the store search/list, “hide games with the tags”. It’s shopping UX 101

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        A “de facto” monopoly (whatever that is) has all the drawbacks of a “real” monopoly (whatever that is): reduced incentive for innovation, possibility for price fixing, means for anticompetitive practices, and so on. The distinction is entirely meaningless when you look at the actual impact an <adjective> monopoly has on society.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Generally it would be true but Valve seems like an exception. Steam is still like 10 years ahead of every other shop front or console.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Epic, GOG, Fanatical, Itch, Humble all exist and compete with with Steam with varying levels of success. And those are just the ones I can name off the top of my head. Does Gumroad do games?

        • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There is no lack of competition. They are just bad in obvious ways. I’m not saying it’s easy to take on a giant like Steam, but Epic for example is exactly the kind of company and amount of money that could. They didn’t, and it’s not because of the library effect. They simply went with the seemingly easiest way: pissing money on the problem (securing timed exclusives and free games). There is so much they could do to make the client and their service better, but they don’t. So no, it’s not a monopoly.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I would be alright with this. Gabe could make a fiscal platform that lets everyone escape MasterVisa’s grip, only charging 1% or thereabouts on every transaction, with barely any moderation. That would let Valve to benefit from other storefronts like GOG, JAST, and DLSite, while also freeing Steam from content restrictions, plus giving freedom to buyers to just get what they want. It is win-win for everyone who isn’t MasterVisa or Collective Shout.

      Plus, Gabe could establish stronger ties with Europe and Asia, which is good if the US balkanizes in the coming decades. It protects from de-dollarization, since Steam would be able to easily allow Americans to use foreign currencies that become more competitive.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Payment processing is only one part of their troubles. The other is lawsuits.