It’s not as bad as that time they permanently deleted user documents and photos.

See they had this trick where if you didn’t have enough space on your drive to unpack an update, they’d just move your shit to OneDrive temporarily, then move it back when the update was done. Only they forgot to move it back, and lost it. Oops.

My snow tires didn’t come with TPMS sensors.

Because they’re not mandated.

Just like LIDAR wasn’t mandated on your car when you bought it.

Do you drive without a LIDAR? Why, do you like to live dangerously?

I live in Canada and my snow tires haven’t had functioning TPMS in years. I do have a tire pressure light on forever, and they’re not mandated.

Moral absolutism benefits only the status-quo.

I suspect the anti-AI push is coming from Russia or China, probably because the AI products that are in such high demand right now are of Western origin.

I understand the problems, but I don’t think they amount to something as simple and close-minded as “all LLM generated code bad and evil”, unless thinking critically takes too much time and energy I guess? Some people just have to make blanket decisions because it’s easier for them.

I use it in C++ and it has been very helpful. The OP appears to be just blanket against AI assistance in programming? There’s no indication of what degree Claude was involved here, or what amount of blind trust the human reviewers gave to it.

Alright, well I use Claude in my code and it produced a better library than anything that was publicly available on Github from me just feeding a PDF of a datasheet for the module into an LLM.

I’m all for not blindly trusting AI, give it limits, review and test everything it makes, but flat out rejecting any AI generated code as “compromised” feels reactionary to me.

What is “AI vulnerable”? What is the problem here? Claude isn’t reverse-Midas, it’s not like everything they touch turns to shit.

I do not because I don’t like ads on Youtube, but thx.

hey thanks, i had never heard of that bypass paywalls firefox addon