Pronouns: He/Him (by convenience)

I’m in the process of regaining some social abilties online. The fediverse and no connection to my civil ID did wonders in this regard, despite my disposition to anxious ruminations and my weak social stamina. Anyway, happy to join a safe space to be open about my queerness.

From what I gathered, I can describe my identity and orientations as: bisexual, polyamorous, trigender, demiboy (I’m a.m.a.b byt he way.), non-binary, isogender, demicisgender. (Both cisgender and transgender seem to hardly fit my identity.) I’m also closeted.

Centralized profile on pronouns.cc : https://pronouns.cc/@un_trop_vert_timide

  • 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2026

help-circle

  • Please tone your condescendence down.

    Those responsibles for MLP (and her kind) rise to power are not their opponents. The main responsible are themselves, their allies, and their goons/hench•wo•men.

    The narrative about the protesters being responsible ignore the decades-long events chronology, the contribution of these big companies to our suffering, the proganda aganist the protesters even when unsupported by facts, etc. It is a blame shifting narrative.




  • Yup, agreed, same French cops that:

    • Count their self-inflicted injuries as injuries inflicted by their “suspect” (target).
    • Don’t follow most laws and rules about weapon usage, about arrest procedure, about state neutrality, about non-discrimination, rape, etc
    • Cover their violent colleagues up.
    • Threaten a young driver (of color, of course) with “I will blow your head off”, while pointing their gun directly to the target’s head. Then, when the target drives away to flee, the cop successfully shoots to kill. The whole police institution defend the murderer citing a recent law that in effect extend the legitimate cases for the use of (lethal) force by police to “suspect” that would “probably” harm others while fleeing. (preventive defensive violence… reminds me of something). Some people even donated moreqthan a million euros to said cop to pay for his legal proceedings. The murder was filmed, and the video shared day one, disproving the police lies about the murder from the start.
    • Confiscate protests signs that don’t please them enough.
    • Consider police violence and abuses as insignificant, always justified and proportionnate, then treat graffitis and stickers from protesters as violent crimes.
    • Sometimes beat up random people carrying palestinian flags in protests.
    • Throw projectiles (I guess grenades, from the impact sound) from behind the protester lines, probably to trigger their colleagues charge. (And deny doing so when they’re caught red-handed by an elected official.)
    • Are fully armored in protests, get collectively knocked down with some serious injuries by their weapon mishandling, but still use these weapons on civilians in plain clothes, directly aiming at them.
    • etc

    Our (french) police intitutions are authoritarian, lethally violent, lying. Our ministers too, since they publicly defend and encourage these intitutions crimes.


  • Reminder of my only two previous comments in this topic:

    Both can be true.

    and

    I’d understand if these tools were small scale, eco-friendly, ethically developped and trained, and owned by the workers.

    Considering most LLM and AI/AI-adjacent tools used are large-scale tools created and owned by big greedy corporations, I’d say the tools themselves are a product of late stage capitalism, thus the bad results they produce are results of simultaneoulsly :

    • the tools themselves
    • why they were created
    • how they were created
    • why they are used
    • how they are used
    • …
    • late stage capitalism (which also influnce the previous items)

    End of the reminder.

    Your answer to that was:

    You started by saying they produce the issues, but are now explaining what I said above, that they are a product of upstream social issues.

    What motivated my answer is:

    Most events have multiple causes and multiple consequences. All of them can also interfere with each other. They can form retroaction loops too.

    What I was explicitely saying is:

    These tools were created and specialised for late-stage capitalism goals. There will be some common consequences, including bad ones, between usage by the big corpos and usage by random persons, whatever their skills. That’s why I said that both these takes are true:

    The output of LLMs is massively increased global warming, increased prices of goods and services, decreased number of jobs, increased numbers of bugs in software, massive increase in wealth migration from poor to the rich, and increased surveillance. None of that has to do with the quality of the users. Just using it at all results in all of those things.

    and

    those things are the outputs out late-stage capitalism.

    It seems that we disagree about my view, but don’t attribute to me shit I didn’t say to fight this false argument.

    So…

    Is this worth discussing.

    Apparently no, at least not when you oversimplify causality and misrepresent what I said. Still worth argumenting for others to have more arguments to weight.

    Now, this discussion looks to me like the stupid “debate” around “guns kill people” VS “guns don’t kill, only the people using them do” in the specific context of gun control laws.

    And also, fuck capitalism, and other systems of exploitation, oppression, domination.