

2·
16 days agoBut… so what?


But… so what?


Encryption exists manually. This isn’t the problem you appear to imagine it is


I’m still not seeing why that is a problem. The information remains even if it has no glyphs.


I can’t work out what you’re asking.
You use “mitigated” like this is some kind of exploit but it’s just unicode text still.
What is the problem with private use areas of unicode?
But it means nothing. You can cypher in much more efficient or clever ways.