Okay, but 2/3 of those items listed in the image above, and in the previous one that circulated aren’t mentioned in any articles I’ve seen discussing the breakdown. For example, jurisdictional preemption on critical minerals hasn’t been mentioned anywhere.

Additionally, the article you linked it vague as to the problems with the cancon streaming requirements and which were the sticking point, but the infographic above makes a bunch of claims about which ones they wanted dropped/changed without any sources providing that level of detail.

Any source for this claim? I havent seen any reliable news source pick up this story and go with it except for random reddit ‘news’ or twitter by non-journalists.

Once again, we need a source more than what appears to be a word processor with a typed list. The OG link at the “dailyspill” on reddit provides no other source or claim.

I’ve got some family in the military, and they’ve served in Europe both before and after Trump. They said there hasn’t been any actual decrease in cooperation while overseas between the US and us, and everyone they talk to makes it clear how ridiculously an order would be taken to invade.

That being said, their last deployment was July last year, so things may have changed. Also he did note that none said they’d reject the order - just how ridiculous the whole situation was. Hoping we never have to find out.