

That moment was decades ago. Too late now you dipshits. Mind you, there will be a change to economic methods and measures, but it won’t be by choice.


That moment was decades ago. Too late now you dipshits. Mind you, there will be a change to economic methods and measures, but it won’t be by choice.


Well done! I love seeing AI get it’s feelings hurt.

I get that and agree. I’m really just referring to future capabilities that existing A"I" (if you like, lol) will contribute to in ways I don’t think we can safely predict.

I agree and fully support you’re human representation. It’s one reason that the patent system needs some adjusting to better reflect that. I don’t agree with your interpretation of AI though. It is early stages and the AI you are being exposed to is not the same ones being developed in the background. With accelerated advancement of results will come a litany of improvements and discoveries that will make previous contributions seem slow. This is just my own take and I hope we have time to find out.

Another question for consideration is at what point will AI be considered sentient and therefore entitled to ownership of its own IP and retention of all profits generated. Because of this implication there will forever be battles to prevent this designation.

Although I agree with some of that sentiment, in many cases it’s no different then someone trying to learn programming by reading textbooks and looking at code shared on the internet. The difference is scale, which may be a hard legal argument to apply.

We have yet to discover how bad it’s current impact has been.
Interesting that just after it’s battle with Paramount for the WB acquisition they are now being sued by Republicans.