I remember this happening to Linksys with the WRT-54g routers. They shipped with firmware based on open software (I don’t remember the exact license) and they were brought to court and forced to release the source code.
In the end it really helped the sales of that model because hobbyists wanted it for the freedom of running their own code on it.
Do you have an example of a project that has both free and commercial licenses? How does that work in practice?
The problem from a user interface perspective is that the search bar and the url are the same field. I don’t have edge, but what happens if they type “Google” into the url bar vs “Google.com” vs “https://google.com”/.
I have this problem at home when I try to go to a device on my lan, like how “http://jellyfin.lan”/ works but “Jellyfin.lan” takes me to a search page.
Until your cell service provider starts requiring either iPhone or android phones…
I did it, well… because I could.
That is a very valid reason. I could see setting it up to learn more about how IPv6 works. I just wanted to see if I could get any actual advantages with it.
office situation where there are a large number of devices
That would make sense as a place to have it. Having a large number of devices where each having an external IP would be handy. My environment really only needs one or two devices having direct external access.
I mean, I don’t have NAT traversal between my NAS and devices on my lan now, they are routed because they are different VLANs but that would happen anyway.
Do people have problem with ip conflicts? I guess if I wasn’t running DHCP that would be possible.
Right now NAT is my main firewall between most devices and the wider internet, but I do still run pfsense and have firewall rules in place.
Switching over to IPv6 seems like it would be extra work for very little actual benefit.
What do you get out of IPv6 for lan routing vs just sticking to IPv4 for everything?
Is it time for Vaultwarden to have its own clients?