Obligatory Fuck Google

Could you give some examples of problem domains that should be left as is? I don’t see the proposal as a problem at all.

About time. This will help to give some transparency about who operates the given domain.

It’s used to change the size of access to GPU memory by the CPU. For some operations it can improve performance quite a bit. This project aims to enable resizable BAR on systems that don’t have BIOS options for it, which likely doesn’t apply to you.

Yes and no. As an author of open source projects, they were made available for people to fork, improve and conrribute under permissive licenses. Then come LLMs that uses code like mine to generate code or slop. My choice about license was made before LLMs. Now they use derivatives of my work without attribution as required by the license.

Even if I change the license, it won’t be respected, and nothing else will change. To me, that’s copyright infringement on me, ignoring the hours I put in.

On a separate note, LLMs only produce more of the same, ignoring the environmental and economic impacts. Often, more of the same is not what we need. It leads to the same mistakes being made. I’ve never used LLM to code, never will.

Statement of fact. Claude was engineered with copyright material.

Open source, but made with a copyright infringing LLM.