I’m not a US teacher but Europe. University. A lot of teachers work in the field part time and part time teacher. We need to have a regulated outcome for our students. How we teach is up to the teacher. If I see that students can just get an A by using AI, then I’m not doing my job. So yeah, I’m not only expected to change how I teach, I’m required.
Regulate? Who is talking about regulating? I’m talking about teaching and the way we grade students. As a teacher myself I know that a lot of students (and people in the workforce) use AI. AI itself is just a tool. You can set it to full auto but that only leads to you being not needed anymore. What I teach my students is to use it responsible and that the AI is being used so it adds value to you. And not let it replace you.
In my opinion the AI is better at some tasks than humans are. Some tasks the human is better. Make yourself useful in the spot that AI is underperforming.
Edit: like some other comment was saying, “you can’t chatgpt through a whole semester”. And if you could, you are on the road of being replaced. If you can’t, congratulations. You learn something the machine can’t do.
Shouldn’t the education system change then? If it is easy to get an A with a machine, should we then not focus on learning something that can’t be done by a machine. I mean, it has value to know things and know what to do insituations where AI is not available.
I think the problem has always been there but now with ai it is magnified. There are always those people who don’t care about quality and want to get it over as quickly as possible. Before ai they could not push so much work so their dumb low quality work was not so prominent. With ai, they are 100x faster than your high quality work. Your work isnt even seen anymore because it is overwhelmed by the low effort work.
I did not know this. That really sucks.