Also don’t use dna tests or chemical analysis. It’s invisible hocus pocus and can be wrong! And woe if someone that fucks and tortures kids regularly is wrongly accused of raping kids and running their child minds no that would be awful
Nope. It’s in special tiny ways we author text. I think.
You are that guy man right in your own special way you are that guy
M2.5 or whatever but it is the only one I tried
Cool insight that is wrong in entirely unfortunate but I get it
It is not true so you may stop if you want
Your son with so much promise that no longer needs to survive, my condolences
You are lazy
Yes and no. It is definitely absolutely bad And yes people do embed things in binaries
No that is what the megacorps wishes. Open weight models are exactly as good but there are no commercial gpus for that so the point is only and only a class war issue
It is so funny the AI haters are the ones fervently ascribing human emotions and human thoughts to the process and then proceed to mansplain to you how they are stochastic parrots but it is glaringly obvious they haven’t researched how it actually works and this feels like the whole facebook mom psychosis way back when they researched by reading lies. No, their responses can be very short also. It depends on your temp
Yes it guesstimates what is wrong with you to argue like that about semantics?
I’m sorry for your loss
Oh. I do that every day
We like internet