I tried the same user, and it worked for me just now. Thanks for working on this project!
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Just fyi, I tried one your instance. Searched a user, clicked a result, and got an error.
Error ./app.lua:134: attempt to concatenate field 'username' (a nil value) Traceback stack traceback: ./app.lua:134: in function 'handler' ...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:185: in function 'resolve' ...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:216: in function <...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ...ittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/application.lua:214: in function 'dispatch' /apps/kittygram/lua_modules/share/lua/5.1/lapis/nginx.lua:231: in function 'serve' content_by_lua(nginx.conf.compiled:92):2: in main chunk
KRAW@linux.communityto
Technology@lemmy.world•Anthropic/OpenAI may be spending more than $1000 for every $100 you pay themEnglish
2·10 days agoImproved hardware capabilities used to come very quickly (see Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling). However that trend is basically over, so getting higher performance hardware takes a lot of effort to make hardware specialized for certain tasks. That’s why you see there inference accelerators like Groq, SambaNova, Cerebrus, etc. However this is hardware that still is gonna go into data centers. Something innovative has to happen on the AI side for commercial-grade models to be runnable on consumer hardware.
In vim you can make some changes to a file, close vim, and then reopen the files, and then undo your changes, i.e. your undo history persists across sessions.
I use helix part-time but am forced to go back to neovim a majority of the time for a few reasons:
- no persistent undo
- no ctags and cscope (some C/C++ projects don’t work well with clangd)
- niche plugins (e.g. I just found a neovim plugin that gives me a way to run ipynb files in-editor)
If 1 and 2 got fixed, I’d be a full time helix user


Or you coukd just use Arch without installing an AUR helper?