Thank you. I wish the same for you.

No, I don’t think so. If his role was a licensed financial councilor maybe, but that’s like thinking the LLM is a licensed psychologist.

Agree to disagree on this. If a computer tells you to off yourself and you listen, this is Darwin award material.

Ai made me do it articles are tired AF. It’s a fucking computer program based on a bunch of crap from the internet. Responses should be viewed the same way you would review financial advice from a crack head. Expecting everything to be so tidy an moderated that this can never happen can only be accomplished with a crippling degree of moderation.

I don’t think its unfortunate that they aren’t perfect, imperfection is baked into their DNA.

Really? I think it’s way more natural than wearing a go pro.

Bedroom is a very reasonable realm for smart glasses if they aren’t connected to the internet and are used for local recording.

The really weird part is wearing them in public and either recording people without their consent or even giving the clear impression of recording people without their consent. Wearing smart glasses in a public place is just an asshole move.

Dynamic sounds way more fun!

Oh man, imagine poisoning your product and then charging more for the poison free version. You’ve Really reached god status when you can pull off a move like that.

Thoughtful evil is the best kind of evil.

That one is already taken by us constipated folk.

Have you been seeing a lot of megacorporations get their act together and start behaving reasonably lately?

I’m betting this ends with Amthropic somehow giving him money.

It’s understandable. Those other examples are completely expected. For a FOSS project people have higher expectations and feel betrayed by Mozilla’s moves with this.

Technically one of us is supposed to call the other a cunt at this point, but will accept your breach of protocol.

‘people like you’ don’t give consumers enough credit. They aren’t ignorant to the privacy concerns. That’s nonsense. They just don’t care about them. People buying these glasses take it a step further though by disrespecting the privacy of others. For that, I will ostracize them and their apologists.
Also what so “cool” exactly to you about strapping an ip camera to your face?

Why?

Sorry bro, I’m still calling you that if you are wearing these glasses.

It’s not a stretch

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/tabloid/hyderabad-chronicle/watch-out-creeps-in-smart-eyewear-1938632

https://sfist.com/2025/10/03/here-come-the-creeps-meta-ray-ban-glasses-dudebro-stalking-women-at-usf-posting-videos-of-them-to-social-media/

https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/bbc-breakfast-exposes-secret-smart-glasses-filming-scandal-523718

I don’t think highly of people that choose to partner with these companies to sacrifice both their own privacy and that of those around them.

You call them what you want to call them, but I think the negative stigma here is good.

I don’t think so. The guy wearing the meta frames next to me on the other hand…

WHAT!!???!!

Can I set mine to loudly blare, “pedophile detected!”?

If they win this I hope some superhero lawyer emerges that cites the very case they won as precident for punishing data theft and nails them with it.