• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2025

help-circle







  • Yes, good points, but what can make financial sense doesn’t need to make economical sense.

    Perhaps in such events we can transition to smaller, maybe RISK-V boards with components from various manufacturers.

    But yes, I too keep hoping consumers would speak up & stop bs practices. Then again, if we kill a consumer industry you can’t just bring it back in a year, and megacorps can weather in the meantime by offering consumers short-term incentives if they make the switch. It’s how all the personal data collection by private corps started, why eg Google had free services (and no ads) & yet was already being valued in the billions.









  • Also SATA. There’s basically no difference.
    (We don’t have all the same needs, so no right or wrong answers. All my current HDDs are SATA, which saves me one smol hassle in potential migrations/changes/salvages/troubleshooting, but nothing major. Perhaps they were even a little tiny bit cheaper new than the same with SAS, but that’s not a rule. I do have two SAS SSDs bcs they looked cool & I wanted to have them even after they become obsolete.)

    Oh, and to clarity the mythos around why “enterprise” in cases when the hardware seems the same CMR - this night not be true, but I feel some components (eg on the board) might be better grade or suited by design to work 24/7 or survive hours of some work intensive load (like ZFS repairs). And finding data/reviews on such stuff whilst having other priorities/restraints (loudness, price) is hard.