

Have they tried doing this for Satoshi Nakamoto yet?
Mastodon: @73ms@infosec.exchange


Have they tried doing this for Satoshi Nakamoto yet?


I don’t really see anything wrong with making an app for the purpose. Bit of a different target audience and probably easier setup. Also raises awareness via news coverage and by getting people to talk about it.


Did this say whether the reasoning models get this right more than the others? Was curious about that but missed it if it was mentioned.


You can say that but it’s entirely different from bringing up deliberately pointing the camera of a device at the jury. And again, there was nothing about them looking at something in particular or anything suggesting the intent to film. As I said it is also very easy to know if the camera is activated.


and do the released facts say here someone was pointing a camera at the jury and the scolding happened as a result of that or are you just inventing a hypothetical with nothing to do with what is being discussed?


I don’t know if it was intentional marketing but it does have that effect and was kinda pointless. I assume people have camera phones in the courtroom with them too but possessing a device that can record doesn’t mean you intend to do it and I doubt Meta has tampered with their glasses so if they were to do that it would be noticeable thanks to the recording LED…
DjVu probably but it’s old and nobody uses it. PDF isn’t ideal seems to be workable enough, it was always a much more functional way to share documents than doc or docx.