okwithmydecay@leminal.space to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agoLondon Marathon: Choir dropped by charity Scope over founder's gender-critical viewswww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up147arrow-down11
arrow-up146arrow-down1external-linkLondon Marathon: Choir dropped by charity Scope over founder's gender-critical viewswww.bbc.co.ukokwithmydecay@leminal.space to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squareOhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·2 days ago "Because of my views - and they’re lawfully held views - they are missing out on this opportunity, and that’s the part that is absolutely galling. And it’s also a lawfully held view for scope to think she’s so terrible that they want nothing to do with her. Fucking coward. If your only justification for your views is that it’s “lawfully held” you need to admit to yourself that you’re a bad person.
minus-squareArmand1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoReminds me of this: As you say, just because it’s (debatably) legal does not mean it is moral.
minus-squareFlamekebab@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 day ago“lawfully held” - when your go-to argument is “it’s not technically illegal” then you might want to consider your stance.
And it’s also a lawfully held view for scope to think she’s so terrible that they want nothing to do with her.
Fucking coward. If your only justification for your views is that it’s “lawfully held” you need to admit to yourself that you’re a bad person.
Reminds me of this:
As you say, just because it’s (debatably) legal does not mean it is moral.
“lawfully held” - when your go-to argument is “it’s not technically illegal” then you might want to consider your stance.