Varesti@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoAn interesting study, perhaps.lemmy.zipimagemessage-square187linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down131
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageAn interesting study, perhaps.lemmy.zipVaresti@lemmy.zip to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square187linkfedilink
minus-squarealila@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·16 hours agoWhy would it skew results? It’s a study of correlation, not causation.
minus-squareLovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoBecause it would add one more variable. “Skew” isn’t really the right word though. It could affect the results in unpredictable ways, discoverable by comparing a separate study done with only autistic kids.
Why would it skew results? It’s a study of correlation, not causation.
Because it would add one more variable. “Skew” isn’t really the right word though. It could affect the results in unpredictable ways, discoverable by comparing a separate study done with only autistic kids.