• BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yah, didn’t they revise 2025 job growth down by like 90%? No possible way to be off by that much without purposeful intention

      • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Theres a reason donnie fired the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after job numbers revised downward

        Weird, huh?

        You legit think those numbers reported under donnies admin are real?

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        That doesn’t really explain why the revisions are generally downwards. It just explains that there’s a preliminary estimate and then a final estimate and then a yearly comprehensive report. So why are you saying revisions are generally downwards because of the process? All I’m seeing is that when jobs are trending down, it’s hard to estimate the amount of jobs because we’re expecting a higher amount of jobs based on historical data, while the actual amount is trending down.