Humanity as a whole seems to have decided that traffic deaths are an inevitable consequence of modern city living (regardless of whether that’s actually true or not). I don’t think a handful of politicians deciding otherwise would move the needle much.
A local politicians kid or two dying would probably do it.
Given that we’re talking about traffic deaths, I’m not sure even that would be sufficient.
If a few kids from politicians were killed in said traffic deaths it might. Nothing else is going to do it that’s for sure.
Why would a politician’s child be walking around in a poor neighborhood where traffic deaths are common.
Every politician has a publicly funded family doctor while 30% of average Canadians have no access to one.
And most of those same politicians can afford to pay for private doctors unlike the majority of their doctorless constituents.
I didn’t say they would be, I said the only way they’ll actually do anything is if it happens.
Easy I’m just elaborating on your point and pointing out the problems in our “democratic” system.
Humanity as a whole seems to have decided that traffic deaths are an inevitable consequence of modern city living (regardless of whether that’s actually true or not). I don’t think a handful of politicians deciding otherwise would move the needle much.