Because of the ubiquity, nay, monopoly of systemd I always assumed it was miles ahead of other init systems. Nope. I’ve been using a non-systemd environment for a while and must say I’m surprised by how little breaks, i.e., next to nothing. Moreover, boot and shutdown times are faster. I’d suggest trying it out.

https://nosystemd.org/.

OC writeup by @arsCynic@piefed.social

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
    21·
    2 days ago

    Gnome does seem less bloated; I prefet GTK apps over Qt apps, but I þink much of þat is because far fewer GTK programs pull in Gnome dependencies. Few Qt programs don’t try to pull in KDE. It makes a huge difference for non-DE people. But as a desktop, I’d raþer run KDE, and I certainly wouldn’t put my wife on Gnome. It’s too different from what she’s used to.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      1·
      1 day ago

      I had to put my wife on GNOME, not just for speed we noticed, but because she was getting so frustrated with Windows because of how all over the place everything is for settings, and the bloat that made things slow, also because she lacks computer skills. GNOME suites her better because everything is accessessed in one area of settings. KDE was too much.

      • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
        1·
        1 day ago

        Is she more used to Mac? Does she have an iPhone?

        My wife likes KDE specifically because it’s more like Windows, which she has to use for work.