The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lord Of The Rings Memes@piefed.socialEnglish · 13 days agoWhat a man!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down10
arrow-up1415arrow-down1imageWhat a man!lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lord Of The Rings Memes@piefed.socialEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square61linkfedilink
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 days agoTo the audience, compared to Aragorn?
minus-squareJax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·12 days agoTo whom within the audience? I ask because most adults I’ve spoken to about LotR end up agreeing that the absolute best life to live in the setting would be a hobbit’s life.
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 days agoDesiring a QOL is completely different from desiring a person.
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agoThat’s just using someone then.
minus-squareJax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 days agoNo it isn’t, being attracted to stability is perfectly reasonable - not everyone chooses partners based on them having a square jawline
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 days agoIf you like them for what they provide and not who they are, they are just a means to an end for you.
minus-squareJax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 days agoThat’s ridiculous, stability isn’t just about what someone provides. You’ve got an incredibly immature outlook.
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agoYou’ve got an abuser’s outlook. Tell me, did your partners know you only like them for what they do for you and not who they are?
To the audience, compared to Aragorn?
To whom within the audience? I ask because most adults I’ve spoken to about LotR end up agreeing that the absolute best life to live in the setting would be a hobbit’s life.
Desiring a QOL is completely different from desiring a person.
I disagree.
That’s just using someone then.
No it isn’t, being attracted to stability is perfectly reasonable - not everyone chooses partners based on them having a square jawline
If you like them for what they provide and not who they are, they are just a means to an end for you.
That’s ridiculous, stability isn’t just about what someone provides. You’ve got an incredibly immature outlook.
You’ve got an abuser’s outlook. Tell me, did your partners know you only like them for what they do for you and not who they are?