• Calfpupa [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    The oppression used in a socialist state is intended to be focused on the bourgeois and those who support counter-revolution, making it distinctly different from a liberal states oppression, which is focused on using oppression to further bourgeois goals. Bourgeois have power to drive counter-revolution as long as they have a foothold anywhere nationally and that presents a real threat to all socialist states. No communist “wants” a state, it is a recognition that as long as there are capitalists that threaten the people, there has to be some sort of system that can resist them at a national level.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      The oppression used in a socialist state is intended to be focused on the bourgeois and those who support counter-revolution

      The operative word being “intended”. Defending regimes that turn that focus to the proletariat is part of what distinguishes a tankie from an actual leftist.

      No communist “wants” a state

      Which is why only consider tankies to be nominally left. I don’t consider them to be real communists.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          I have given the definition at least once, and linked the Wikipedia page where it is well defined. Some people using the word incorrectly doesn’t mean it isn’t well defined.