Archived

Concerns over China’s policies toward Uyghurs were raised by Dolkun Isa, President of the Germany-based Uyghur Center for Democracy, on the sidelines of the 63rd session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva.

[…]

He pointed to growing international pressure, including a UN report on Uyghurs, the Uyghur Tribunal verdict and the recognition of a motion on alleged Uyghur genocide by the Mozambique Parliament.

“There is growing international pressure from the UN report on Uyghurs, the Uyghur Tribunal verdict, and the Mozambique Parliament recognising a motion on Uyghur genocide. A lot of international media have also covered this,” he said.

“So, China cannot continue hiding the reality. The Chinese government is now trying to hide and whitewash what I describe as the ongoing Uyghur genocide by slightly changing its tactics and strategy,” Isa said.

[…]

From Communication Blackout to ‘Propaganda Tours’

Recalling restrictions imposed since 2017, Isa said communication between Uyghurs and the outside world had been severely curtailed.

“Since 2017, China has cut off all communication. It cancelled all international flights between Urumqi and other countries, cut internet communication, and collected the passports of Uyghurs. No one could travel,” he said.

[…]

The Chinese government had subsequently changed its approach by allowing visitors to travel to the region.

He alleged that the government also organised what he described as propaganda tours for foreign journalists, diplomats and scholars.

“The Chinese government organised propaganda tours, inviting journalists, diplomats and so-called scholars. They paid for business-class flights, five-star hotels and everything, and organised everything very carefully,” Isa said.

He said such visits were aimed at creating an impression that conditions in the region were gradually returning to normal.

[…]

Isa further alleged that Uyghurs continued to face detention and forced labour.

“Millions of people are still suffering in concentration camps. Forced labour is still a critical issue. There are people being forced into labour both inside and outside the camps,” he said.

“More than one million Uyghur children are also still separated from their families,” Isa added.

Referring to China’s ethnic unity law, Isa said, “Recently, on July 1, China’s Ethnic Unity Law came into effect. So, it is a very dangerous situation.”

He also raised concerns over the status of Uyghur and Tibetan languages, saying, “Today, the Uyghur and Tibetan languages continue to be completely eradicated from daily life and schools, at every level.”

[…]

Isa said that the situation might not always be immediately visible to visitors travelling to the region, but alleged that pressure on Uyghurs had continued to intensify.

“If you just go there, maybe you cannot see it visibly. But actually, the pressure has been getting stronger recently,” he said.

[…]

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    “China won’t allow people to visit! What are they hiding?”

    “China will allow people to visit! They’re trying to whitewash what’s happening!”

    During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

    What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

    • Michael Parenti