• missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If you want to set a precedent, you have to first pick a battle you can actually win. Your inability to answer the question comes across as a tacit admission that 14 years isn’t unreasonable, in which case I don’t see this fight as winnable.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you want to set a precedent, you have to first pick a battle you can actually win

      And who decides that, you?

      Your inability to answer the question

      I just answered your question in detail… and my hesitation does not come from anything you said, it comes from the suspicion, now confirmed, you were just going to attack my personal position to justify yours.

      It seems you still do not understand how the legal system works

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t think that trying to argue that 14 years isn’t enough is a winnable battle. I don’t think expecting support to be forever and ever to be a precedent that will ever be set.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think that trying to argue that 14 years isn’t enough is a winnable battle

          THAT IS NOT WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED! Fuck man, if you want to have a conversation here the least you can do is read the fucking article