• Narauko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another way to look at it is comparing water to electricity itself. No one is complaining that going from the electric light bulb to vacuum tube logic gates to semiconducter logic gates to q-bit logic gates is just “using physics to direct electrons again”.

    Boiling water is just the layer 1 physical transport, all the cool stuff is happening at layers 2-7. The real mind blowing breakthrough would be if they finally did something to fix layer 8, but I ain’t holding my breath.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      semiconducter logic gates to q-bit logic gates is just “using physics to direct electrons again”.

      I mean, even if they start getting quantum programming off the ground, no one is going to be able to afford the fucking computers. We can’t even afford non quantum computers anymore.

      Boiling water is just the layer 1 physical transport, all the cool stuff is happening at layers 2-7. The real mind blowing breakthrough would be if they finally did something to fix layer 8

      I don’t understand this layer stuff

          • Narauko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Layer 8 is colloquially the User, as that is the next “layer” up above the application. Only really used in a troubleshooting context indicating where the issue took place, it’s the networking equivalent for an PEBKAC (problem exists between keyboard and chair). For this analogy, layer 8 would probably be physics itself though.

            I felt the OSI model was pretty relevant because while speeds and latency has improved astronomically, it is all still run off of the Ethernet framework and the humble copper twisted pair and fiber optic cable aren’t really substantively different than they were in the 70s.